Ezequiel Centurion (4): Little reaction to Ezequiel Centurión’s three goals. Although he had little to do in the second and third goals, the goalkeeper started out in a bad position.
Agustín Sant’Anna (3): In Independiente’s second goal he loses the mark along with Boselli. Very little offensive participation before leaving at halftime.
Sebastian Boselli (4): Although the match had started in a good way, the Uruguayan did not cover Martínez in the first moment and then Vázquez escaped for the second. Correct performance in the second half.
David Martinez (2): Hasty pressure on Independiente Rivadavia’s goal. In the second goal, he seemed untimely and slow. In the second half he was badly stopped in a counterattack by the home team, leaving the forward alone, and later lost the mark in the fourth. Very slow.
Milton Casco (3): Inattention in the background for Sartori’s overflow in Independiente Rivadavia’s second goal. He came out at halftime.
Matías Kranevitter (3): Match without participation of the central midfielder, both in defense and offense. So much so that in the first half the ball passed him by when he was tying his laces.
Santiago Simón (5): He started the game in a great way and even almost scored the first header.
Agustín Palavecino (3): The game started very quickly, with several inaccuracies. Although he sought to participate, almost all of his deliveries were failures.
Manuel Lanzini (4): Participatory in the game, with mistakes or successes, number 10 tried to be the protagonist even though inactivity weighed heavily on him.
Franco Mastantuono (5): Always an option to create play, asking for the ball and constantly looking for spaces. However, as the minutes passed, he became imprecise and had a bad quarter of an hour in the second half.
Facundo Collidio (4): Beyond the desire he usually has, this search ended up working against number 11, since he was never well positioned and did not fit into the game.
They entered River:
Daniel Zabala (4): Little participation in the game. He suffered too much from Independiente Rivadavia’s counterattacks.
Agustín Ruberto (4): Although at the beginning of the second half he gave the team a game, the match slowed down to the point of having several problems controlling the ball.
Tobias Leiva (4): He looked to the left at several times, creating good spaces. However, he did not accompany David Martínez with his regression and his entry ended up harming the team defensively.
Esequiel Barco (5): He was participatory in the minutes he had and, although he did not generate much, he showed that he is a key piece for River’s offense.
Ian Subiabre (5): A pretty good match for a boy who is playing for the third time with the first team. He did what he could and tried to penetrate the area.
Rodrigo Aliendro (6): He entered well and in just a few minutes he took a great shot that hit the crossbar. After this he was one of the players who looked for the ball the most.
Rodrigo Villagra (4): Virtually zero participation although he lost two divided balls in the middle of the court.
Ignacio Fernández (5): He got the discount with a well-placed free kick but without as much power. After this, the 26th sought to be River’s creative, but he could do little.
Martin Demichelis (3): Although the starting eleven showed good moments in the first half, the pace of the game and the lack of reaction due to it being a friendly cost them dearly. The changes in the second half completely dismantled the team.
Which River player entered the best?
Which River player entered the best?
1183 PEOPLE HAVE ALREADY VOTED
2024-03-23 00:55:19
#Analysis #Player #River #player #Independent #Rivadavia
