Please clarify the suspicion of the 2021 national badminton player selection screening. > Blue House, Republic of Korea

I am so sad and painful with an incomprehensible decision that I complained of my circumstances. Please take a look at my resentful heart, and I plead with you to prevent an unfair victim like me from coming out again.

A while ago [2021.1.18.~1.23]He is the current national *** player who participated in the 2021 Badminton National Team Championship held at the Gunmin Sports Center in Muju-gun, Jeollabuk-do.

In the meantime, there have been a lot of corruption and accidents in the sports world, but I did not know that I would be the victim of the victim. I listened only to the news about corruption and negativity regarding the selection of athletes in each sport, and considered it like someone else’s work, and I had been concentrating only on sports.

I would like to say that there are many parts that are suspected of being illegal in the selection screening of the national team. A good reason to be a clue to the suspicion is that the list of selectors who needed extremely security until January 23, the day of the announcement of national player selection, was in full swing on the second (January 19) day when the competition was in full swing. Inappropriate comments were heard from our team leader who participated in the tournament, but it spread rapidly through rumors following the remarks that seemed to have already been selected for the national team of a specific team player, and even more incomprehensible is that a player from the KGC team before the selection was held. Words of being selected were already circulating openly among players. At first, I thought it was a rumor, but as rumored, the Mo player was finally included in the list of starters.

I hated to think of these and that words, and I only tried to make my mind and focus on the competition during the selection period. However, when I came to the stadium, it seemed that there was a problem with the composition of the judges, so I went to the competition with a heavy heart. Three of the six judges were the leaders of the players who participated in the national player selection. I only sighed for a while, and I was so stunned that I couldn’t understand, but I couldn’t do anything. It was an unconvincing selection system in which three judges judged the players of their team with their own hands, and it was a composition of judges that could not be understood by anyone. I thought that if the composition of the judges who are in a great position to select the best players representing Korea would be like this, it would be possible to make a fair judgement.
In the first place, the association was supposed to announce the representative players through the Competition Performance Improvement Committee (13:00) after the selection was ended on January 23rd. According to an official from the association on the day, I heard from our team leader that the selection of men’s doubles has been confirmed, but women’s doubles have yet to be announced because the screening has been delayed. Until now, it was not possible to know what English it was, but the selection of women’s doubles was on hold, and only on the afternoon of January 26, the fourth day, the association announced the final list.

But before the official announcement of the association, I had already heard from a player on Sunday, January 24 that a list of men’s doubles and women’s doubles selections came out. I wasn’t surprised at how the unannounced list could come out of a player, but I waited with the thought that it wasn’t. After waiting so, it wasn’t until the afternoon of January 26 that the association announced the final list. It was a real shock to me.
The list of starters I heard from a player and the list announced by the association matched without any error.

If I think about it now, it is because I am conscious of the rumors that go around before the selection, or whether the evaluation of the judges was inappropriate, or whether there was a problem with the judging process or method. The reason is that there are parts that cannot be understood when looking at the list of players selected as national players this time.

This is because a decision was made that could not be convinced by comparing anything such as the current world rankings and recent performance performances. This is because it is an unacceptable decision even when comparing the current world rankings and the list of national players and the win rate.

***/*** (4th place) automatic selection
***/*** (6th place) automatic selection
***/*** (9th place) automatic selection
***/*** (10th place) Participation in the selection (only *** players are eliminated) 9 Win 4 Lose
***(Mixed doubles) automatic selection
***(Hwasun County Office) Selection
***(Samsung Life Insurance) Selection
***(Samsung Life Insurance) Selection
***(KGC Ginseng Corporation) selection

All of the national doubles athletes during the Olympics race have been reselected, and I am the same athlete during the Olympics race, but I can’t understand why I was only eliminated. I am (currently ranked 10th in the world) and given the only bronze medal to the Korean squadron in the situation that I was a no-medal for badminton in Korea at the Rio Olympics in Brazil. Danish Open Championship (750) 2019 India Open Championship (300) 2020 domestic (Jecheon, Haenam) competition twice and during the Olympic race together ***/*** (World 4th) Jo also won and consecutive individual doubles championships I did. I couldn’t help doubting my eyes at the moment, so I looked at it for a while. Maybe it’s because of the influence of the judges who usually see me negatively in my career? When it came to this situation, I felt very special. I beg you once again. We sincerely appeal to you to shed some light on how such a screening result came out.

The screening criteria for the selection of national representatives are said to be 50% win rate and 50% evaluation score. It is a selection system that allows the judges to negate and manipulate the evaluation score alone, even if the win rate is good because the criteria and detailed items for the evaluation score (50%) are not known. This is because 50% of the evaluation score belongs to the judges. Participating players had to make a selection without knowing the selection criteria other than their own win rate. A thorough investigation has been conducted to quickly correct the current system that cannot be understood, such as requiring test takers to take the test without knowing the test questions, so I ask you to prevent recurrence and come up with a plan so that an unfair athlete like me does not appear again.

To this end, we have also prepared an institutional rule for the composition of the national team judges, so I plead that there are no more athletes who are hurt. With the current judging committee composition, there seems to be no meaning of selection. The incomprehensible system in which the players of their own team are judged and selected directly by the judges must be systematically improved, and the same opportunity as the athletes who have been together during the Olympics races, giving me a chance once again, who was unfairly eliminated through a thorough investigation. I beg you to be given a chance, and I appeal once more to stop the misfortune of taking away your last dreams and hopes as a player.

In the end, I ask you sincerely. With this opportunity, we reviewed the quality and ability of the judges and the easy administration of the Korean Badmin Association, and evaluated for the strong disciplinary action of the former judges who caused controversy with inappropriate remarks and for the right to know of all players participating in the selection of national players. We ask that you transparently disclose the items, detailed scoring criteria, eligibility requirements for judges, and the list of judges.

[본 게시물의 일부 내용이 국민 청원 요건에 위배되어 관리자에 의해 수정되었습니다]

.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *