Violence erupted in Frankfurt, Berlin and Hamburg after young people protested across roughly 30 German cities on Oct. 31 against the government’s social spending cuts, and the fallout has reignited a bitter national dispute over immigration inside Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s governing coalition, L’Express reported.
The demonstrations, organized by a youth movement called Gen Z Regelt, were largely peaceful. But when they ended, disorder broke out in the three cities, and within days senior ministers were publicly blaming “troublemakers from the immigrant community” — a claim the Interior Ministry itself said it could not yet back with statistics.
Dobrindt blames “immigrant community” troublemakers after Frankfurt ransacking
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt of the Christian Social Union (CSU) set the tone on Nov. 1 in an interview with Bild, formally accusing “violent far-left groups and troublemakers from the immigrant community” of ransacking 17 shops in Frankfurt, including one that sold firearms; five of the shops were looted, L’Express reported.
The same day, however, the Interior Ministry clarified that it held no statistics on the profiles of those responsible for the destruction. That did not stop Merz, whose CDU governs in coalition with the CSU, from backing his minister: government spokesman Stefan Kornelius said the chancellor “aligned himself” with Dobrindt while conceding the troublemakers amounted to only “a handful” of people.
Also on Nov. 1, Education and Family Minister Karin Prien of the CDU told Deutschlandfunk that the perpetrators “appear to come from immigrant backgrounds,” while adding that she wanted to examine the causes of possible integration problems.
Police report Molotov cocktails as Dobrindt vows “severe sanctions”
Speaking Nov. 3 at the federal congress of the police union, Dobrindt promised that “rioters and looters will be identified and held responsible” and that “severe sanctions must follow this breach of the peace.” He also praised the police’s “highly professional” work in preventing “violent excesses like those in Paris,” L’Express reported.
The police union, for its part, reported broken shop windows and Molotov cocktails thrown at officers. Andreas Robkopf, president of the federal police section, told the same newspaper as his minister that colleagues on the ground “confirm precisely the existence of these groups of perpetrators of violence in their reports,” alluding to the “migrant milieu” invoked by Dobrindt.
Pistorius, Röttgen and the Greens push back on the immigration framing
The wave of comments linking immigrant populations to the looters drew sharp disagreement from across the political spectrum, exposing cracks in the coalition. Defense Minister Boris Pistorius of the Social Democrats (SPD), asked on ZDF on Nov. 1 about Dobrindt’s remarks, questioned what “groups from immigration” actually means — whether it covers people who have lived in Germany for three generations and hold German nationality — and warned that the distinction “leads us in the wrong direction.”
Even within Merz’s own bloc, Norbert Röttgen, vice-chair of the CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag, disavowed Dobrindt, saying “there is not a single type of migrant community in Germany.”
The left-wing opposition seized on the demographic argument. Franziska Brantner, co-chair of the Greens, told the Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger that about half of those involved in the clashes had an immigrant background — but the same proportion applied among young people who protested peacefully. She noted that in big German cities, often one in two young people has immigrant origins. Clara Buenger, interior affairs spokesperson for the Left Party, added that research shows crime “cannot simply be explained by a person’s origin” but by factors such as social background and opportunity. She called the interior minister’s remarks “intolerable” and likely to stir “racist resentments,” arguing that a generation’s concerns “will not disappear through racist narratives, but through a policy that takes their demands seriously.”
Questions still open after the protests
Who were the perpetrators, exactly? The Interior Ministry said on Nov. 1 that it had no statistics on the profiles of those who carried out the violence, so any claim about their backgrounds remains unverified by official data.
How many shops were damaged? L’Express, citing the events in Frankfurt, reported 17 shops ransacked, five of them looted, including one firearms store.
What happens to those arrested? Dobrindt told the police union congress on Nov. 3 that rioters and looters would be identified and face severe sanctions, but no figures on arrests have been confirmed.
The dispute is not settled. With the ministry acknowledging it lacks data on who caused the violence, and with ministers from the same coalition publicly contradicting one another on whether immigration explains the unrest, the question of what actually happened in Frankfurt, Berlin and Hamburg — and what it means for Germany’s immigration debate — remains open.
Worth a look
