The Peruvian Football Federation surprised by publishing a official response addressed to Álvaro Barcosports manager of University of Sportsafter his statements in which he described the Liga 1 as a “corpse” and questioned the management of the tournament under the current administration.
In the statement, the FPF expressed his dissatisfaction with the leader’s comments and stressed that the team Ate achieved the three-time national championship under the same format that is now the subject of criticism. According to the highest national football body, this scheme has also allowed the club to significantly increase its financial income.
The office generated many reactions and many criticized the entity he presides Agustin Lozano. Eddie Fleischman supported Barco and attacked the Federation for a controversial statement stating that the national tournament improved with the decision on television rights.
“The last sentence exposes the hypocrisy of this FPF run by the fake Agustín Lozano: “the reputational damage caused”. No one has caused greater “reputational damage” to Peruvian football than Lozano, sanctioned for TICKET RESALE case. Álvaro Barco is right, he only told the truth”the sports journalist published on his ‘X’ account (formerly Twitter).
The Peruvian Football Federation issued a firm response directed at Álvaro Barcothe sports director of University of Sports. The organization discarded the manager’s statements and, strikingly, highlighted the club’s three-time championship achievement, which provoked numerous reactions among fans and the football environment.
“As the governing body of Peruvian football, the FPF maintains its commitment to increasing competitiveness.However, he regrets that Mr. Barco describes as a “corpse” the tournament that has allowed the club he represents today to have been champion in the last three years and to have received unprecedented income.These types of statements affect all of Peruvian football, also belittling the work of the clubs who are responsible for the sustainability of the championship,” says one of the points of the official letter published by the FPF.
Furthermore, the entity of Agustin Lozano demanded that the ‘U’ retract its statements: “The FPF urges the University Sports Club to comment on the statements made by its manager,“considering the responsibility that his position implies and the reputational damage caused.”
Alvaro Barco criticized the management of the Peruvian Football Federation of League 1 after the conflict over television rights. He specified that the FPF He gave the clubs a championship in decline.
“The federation has given us a championship, where I consider that it is, that it is today, that it is a corpse, not even in the UCI, that it is in a cemetery. Let’s try to refloat it. We are going to try to revive it and have the best championship, try to ensure that the clubs, in some way, have some economic solidity,” said the manager.
Doubts arose about a possible postponement of the start of the Liga 1 due to delays in payments 1190 Sportsthe company responsible for television rights. The organization assured that the financial situation is under control and there are no delays in obligations.
Despite this announcement, the ‘creams’ They expressed their disagreement with the continuity of the company in charge of the transmission. Barco expressed concerns regarding the new contract and warned about the risk of generating “unfair competition” for other teams.
“Now we are going to try to make an autonomous, strengthened league, where we have to decide. It cannot be that in this case the federation has intervened transversally in our economy, through a company that was an adventurous company.a company that had no guarantees, that had no support,” he declared.
