I did not protect the executive committee, claims Hadamczik after the criticism. He no longer resists filing a criminal complaint

After Hadamczik’s performance on Wednesday, for example, former hockey player and now TV commentator Jakub Koreis spoke up, who tweeted on his social networks: “The executive committee didn’t know about anything? Seriously? It is hard to imagine that such tunnels are happening in the union (according to AH) and the executive committee does not know about it. Won’t it be presented that way because Alois Hadamczik has to get along with VV? He could hardly ask their members to approve his visions and plans if he threw them under the bus now.”

In a similar way, Czech TV hockey commentator Ondřej Zamazal asked publicly on Twitter: “The executive committee had no idea. What is such a VV for? Or do we not want to throw it around?” Sport.cz also asked similar questions in its commentary.

However, Petr Dědek, the owner of the extra-league Pardubice, immediately demanded the dissolution of the executive committee. “It is unimaginable that the people responsible for billions of dollars worth of damage remain in office. The president of the union is obliged to recover damages from these people as well.”

Hadamczik already explained on Wednesday that he had to trust the documents and that he did not find any mistakes or approval of non-standard payments in the minutes of the executive committee. It is strange, however, that a member of the committee is, for example, Daniel Sadil, the head of the Litoměřice hockey team, on which Hadamczik did not leave a thread dry and said that they were paid extra millions by the union…

“I did not protect the executive committee. The fact that the members are statutory representatives and have shared responsibility is a different matter,” he said now. He further added that the police have already requested the results of the audit. And he is no longer so adamant that he will not file any criminal charges against the culprits, as he claimed on Wednesday . And that it is “unnecessary” because Petr Dědek had already submitted it earlier. “If the criminal report filed by Petr Dědek was insufficient, I am not opposed to filing a new one.”

Hadamczik also responded during the “tweeting afternoon” to his predecessor Tomáš Král, who on Wednesday ironically commented on the published audit and remarks that people from the union spent money from company cards on luxury items in a store in Prague’s Pařížská street. Král declared for ČTK: “I think that the whole event is worthy of Hadamczik. And it amazes me how some people eat it. But it is typical of his expression that he always says A, but forgets to say B. So when it is said that I used the credit card for purchases in Pařížský, it was only for purchases related to the union. I’d have to be a fool to pay for it myself.”

And Hadamczik wrote: “If Mr. Král says that I claim only A, then during January I will tell him B from the accounting documents.”