NBA Finals – Insights into the Celtics win vs. Warriors in Game 3: How Boston created a mentality monster

The Boston Celtics reclaimed their lead in the series in Game 3 of the NBA Finals. Once again, the Warriors are the best team of all time for twelve minutes – but once again the mentality monster from Boston strikes. The findings.

1. NBA Finals: Boston Tactical Knives Fruits Vs. Warriors

After Game 2, calls came from many corners of the basketball world for the Celtics to play more small ball, and coach Ime Udoka followed suit. For at least three quarters before returning to his familiar lineup of two bigs (Al Horford and Robert Williams III). In a way, both turned out to be the right decision, Udoka’s adjustments bore fruit both before and during the 116:100 win against the Warriors.

It started with an increased focus on small ball. Although the same starting five as in games 1 and 2 started with just Horford and Williams III, Udoka took the latter off the field after 3:15 minutes of play to replace him with Derrick White – much earlier than usual. So Horford was the only big, later Boston played a few minutes with Williams III as the only center and also with Grant Williams, who anyway only acts as a floor spacer.

This paid off especially when it came to spacing, one of the problems in Game 2. Boston’s small ball widened the playing field, opening up the zone for drives. In the first quarter it was mainly Jaylen Brown who shook off his defender Draymond Green several times and created from his penetrations either for himself or for his teammates. With Golden State also calling the small ball, the dubs lacked almost any ring protection.

The statisticians then counted 18 plays by the Celtics directly at the ring, four times the home side drew a foul, the result of the other 14 plays was 10 goals. Noisy Second Spectrum Boston scored 1.4 points per drive in the first half – an outstanding value. However, the Warriors’ weak point-of-attack defense must also be mentioned, which too often let Boston’s guards into the zone too easily. In addition to Green, this also applied to Stephen Curry, who acted too passively and loudly due to his foul problems ESPN allowed an enemy hit rate of 8/12 FG.

But there was another reason for the success of these lineups. In a direct comparison of the small-ball lineups of the Warriors and Celtics, Boston has significantly more size and athleticism in their hand luggage, which was noticeable in the rebound numbers (15:6 offensive rebounds, 22:11 second chance points).

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *