The Spanish destroyed the calculations of the Game Insight Group (GIG), processed by Infosys, the Indian computer giant.
The clock at the Rod Laver Arena said 12:35 p.m. and the final three hours had not yet passed, but Daniil Medvedev He already had a two-set lead and was leading 1-0 in the third. At that time, according to Smarkets, a British betting exchange company, the Russian’s chances of victory reached 98%. At that very moment, according to the official tool of the Australian Open, the comeback options of Reef Nadal did not exceed 4%. After all, in his previous 62 appearances at Grand Slams he had only gone 0-2 against Robert Kendrick (Wimbledon, 2006) and Mikhail Youzhny (Wimbledon, 2007). In addition, Medvedev had a record of 33-0 in majors played on hard court after winning the first two sets. The Muscovite’s power from the back of the court, who dominated 24-19 in points decided by nine or more shots, seemed to have decided the fate of the match. Or at least the computers thought so.
Since 2018, the advanced statistics of the Australian Open have been signed by the Game Insight Group (GIG), a prestigious group of computer scientists and engineers, under the umbrella of the Australian Tennis Federation and the University of Victoria, commanded by Dr. Sam Robertson. “Our mathematical models cover a wide spectrum. Not only the tennis player’s state of form, nor the entity of his last opponents, but also the surface on which he plays or the percentage of points won with the service”, they explain to EL MUNDO GIG sources. Obviously, the most intricate elements of its algorithm, those that allow it to differentiate itself from the rest, are reserved with extreme caution.
In any case, the work of GIG is complemented by that of Infosys, a company in charge of transmitting the data to millions of fans, not only during the first major of the season, but in 60 more tournaments. Including the last Roland Garros, where they enhanced their tools, based on artificial intelligence, at the service of tennis players and coaches. After seven years of collaboration with the ATP, no one considers the Indian IT giant a newcomer on the circuit. However, Nadal’s enormous reaction shattered all his figures. How to explain the triumph of the will against the power of machines?
The former coach of Kyrgios
Adri Arbus, a doctor from Pompeu Fabra University, offers some answers. “A model of the probability of victory or defeat can be built based on the result and the remaining time. And from there, improve it little by little, with what we call eventing data, the way each point and each game is crumbled“, begins this expert in artificial intelligence applied to sport. “However, the really interesting part comes later, through the data from tracking, facilitated by previous work with tracking cameras. With them you can contextualize what happens, for example, with fatigue. And through there, how does the strategy on the track evolve?
In the case at hand, the Australian Open maintains an alliance with Swing Vision, an application that analyzes each stroke through a camera installed on a mobile phone. It is one of the innovations introduced by Machar Reid, responsible for the Department of Sport Science of the Australian Federation. And to process that brutal volume of information, the GIG has recently incorporated Simon Rea, former coach of Nick Kyrgios Y Sam Stosur. However, in light of what was seen on Sunday, there is still a long way to go.
“The objective is to find generalizable models, but at the same time they are also interpretable. Because sometimes there is a risk of giving too much information to the model. I fear that if in the final it had been applied more personally to Nadal’s case, they would have refined more,” says Arbus. “With Nadal you always have to take into account the key factor of his mental strength. That way he sees himself, even well behind the scoreboard, capable of completely turning the fortunes of the match. This is difficult to capture with data, but Yes, it can be complemented by history”, completes the data scientist at Zelus Analytics.
Arbus’s words update, in some way, that conclusive judgment issued by Gnter Bresnik, coach of Dominic Thiem, after the 2018 Roland Garros final. “We are talking about the best competitor of all time. And I don’t just mention tennis,” said the Austrian coach. With a favorable 5-4 in the final round, after letting the resolution escape with his service, Nadal overcame another of those moments that would have taken away anyone’s morale. “Ah I thought: ‘Fuck, I’m going to lose like in 2012 and 2017.’
Agreement with Bara Innovation Hub
It should also not be forgotten that before the final the GIG estimates gave Medvedev an advantage of 64% and that this figure remained almost intact at the start of the fifth set (63%), despite the fact that Rafa arrived with the momentum of the heroic and the breath of the stands. Those balances, of course, did not leave in a very good place the predictions that Robertson himself had pronounced the previous weeks. “Our new projects will add another layer of detail to the understanding of what will happen on the track.” In recent months, one of the achievements of the GIG was its agreement with the Bara Innovation Hub, the laboratory promoted in 2017 by Josep Maria Bartomeu to apply technological advances to improve the performance of Barça football.
There is always the risk of something happening to break the mold.
“I don’t think this is negative publicity for the companies involved, although it does draw a lot of attention to the general public. If there wasn’t a resounding failure within the model, all this will serve as learning to develop other types of tools. I am convinced that that everything must go for the better, with more and more precise models”, Arbus points out, preferring to focus on the inescapable tenseness of the Mallorcan. “It seemed very exaggerated that it only had 4% and with a higher percentage there would not have been such a stir. Better models will come out, but that does not mean that what is seen on Sunday will continue to be something that is out of the sample. There is always the risk of something happens that breaks the mold”, he concludes.
At the moment, after his success in Melbourne Park, Nadal’s winning percentage in Grand Slam amounts to 87.9%, better than the 87.5% of Novak Djokovic and 86% of Roger Federer. Slo Bjorn Borg, with 89.2%, is ahead in the Open Era. The digits are enlarged with 55% of points earned in majors, out of a total of 66,663. Perhaps next March 4, during the 16th edition of Sloan Sports Analytics, organized by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), some expert will find some explanation for this excess. Or maybe Nadal is still inscrutable to the machines.
According to the criteria of
Know more
