Process distributed for trial to judges in the e-mole case

The information was transmitted today to Lusa news agency by a judicial source, adding that Paulo Registro, of Judge 18, will be the president of the collective of judges, also composed by judges Ana Paula Conceição and Helena Leitão, with no date yet for the beginning of the trial, in which Rui Pinto will answer for 90 crimes.

This group of judges is the same one that will judge the ‘e-mole’ case (which is still awaiting decision on a pending appeal), whose main defendant is the former legal advisor of SAD do Benfica Paulo Gonçalves, but in this case the owner of the case is judge Ana Paula Conceição.

Rui Pinto, who had been in preventive detention since March 22, 2019, was placed under house arrest on April 8, but in housing provided by the Judiciary Police (PJ) and without internet access, with the order of the criminal investigation judge ( JIC) Cláudia Pina justifying that the defendant has “now a critical sense and a willingness to collaborate with justice”.

In January of this year, the Criminal Instruction Court of Lisbon decided to bring to trial lawyer Aníbal Pinto (only for the crime of attempted extortion against Doyen), and Rui Pinto for 90 crimes of illegitimate access, improper access, violation of correspondence, sabotage information technology and attempted extortion, but dropped 57 of the 147 crimes for which the accused had been accused by the Public Ministry (MP).

However, the prosecutor of MP Patrícia Barão appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal of Lisbon (TRL), arguing that the defendant should be tried for the 147 crimes included in the indictment, awaiting this decision, which has no effect. suspensive trial.

In September 2019, the MP accused Rui Pinto of 147 crimes, 75 of which of illegitimate access, 70 of violation of correspondence, seven of them aggravated, one of computer sabotage and one of attempted extortion, for accessing Sporting’s computer systems, Doyen, the law firm PLMJ, the Portuguese Football Federation and the Attorney General’s Office, and subsequent disclosure of dozens of confidential documents of these entities.

.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *