Suarez exam, prosecutors: “Juve hindered the investigation”

According to the chief prosecutor Cantone, the Juventus club would also have been notified of the ongoing investigation. And probably for this reason he would have given up on the business that was to bring the Uruguayan to Turin

“There are well-founded doubts that the Juve representatives could have been aware of this procedure and the technical activities in progress in the period from 8 to 14 September.” This sentence, written by the chief prosecutor of Perugia Raffaele Cantone together with the pb Abbritti and Mocetti, puts in writing a widespread suspicion but so far not expressed: the possibility that Juventus in those days has left the track-Suarez not for a choice of transfer market, as stated in the past, but because warned by the ongoing investigation into the Perugian examination of the attacker then at Barcelona. This is the main news of the day on the investigations for the Suarez language test of 17 September, as reported by Corriere della Sera and La Repubblica.

THE PHRASES OF THE LEGAL

Naturally, in the light of this hypothesis, the reading of the sentences pronounced by the Juventus lawyer, Maria Turco, also changes in a phone call with the director of the University for Foreigners of Perugia, Simone Olivieri, on 14 September. In that phone call, Turco asked that Suarez take the exam “as a person who does not kick the ball by trade”, without favoritism.

THE TESTIMONIALS

The Prosecutor also writes The Republic, believes there were lies in the testimony of the lawyer Luigi Chiappero, a Juventus legal historian, on 25 October, “in the part in which he claims to have contacted the deputy prefect Antonella Dinacci after having found her name on the Viminale website” and in the passage with which Chiappero he argued that “Dinacci made him understand that there was no time to obtain citizenship by October 6”. The Juve lawyers in reality, claims the prosecutor, would have come to speak with Dinacci after having contacted Minister De Micheli, a youth friend of Fabio Paratici, and the head of the cabinet of the Minister of the Interior, Bruno Frattasi.

As for the football motivation for the decision to abandon the Suarez track, “for the investigators it is a ‘false representation’ based on a ‘non-existent assumption’ – writes the Corriere della Sera – because opposite indications had come from the Interior Ministry: Suarez could become Italian in time for Juventus’ needs. “The prosecutors would also speak of” probative pollution “by Chiappero and Paratici: with their false declarations they would have made it difficult reconstruction of the facts.

.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *