Roland Garros: The Unique Challenge | TennisTemple

While almost the entire professional circuit adopts electronic refereeing, Roland Garros remains faithful to its line judges. An assumed choice, between respect for traditions and defense of a certain romanticism of French-style tennis.

© AFP

Adrien Guyot

2 min to read

Roland Garros still reluctant to technology

The only Grand Slam that is played on clay, Roland Garros is the last of the four Majors to resist the arrival of ELC (Electronic Line Calling) on the professional circuit. With the traces of the impact of the ball on the surface, the organization considers that it is not necessary to implement this system.

Roland Garros has also confirmed in a statement that the linesmen will still be present in May 2026 to perpetuate the tradition of the tournament: «In the 2025 edition, 404 referee officials were present. Among them were 284 French representatives from all the leagues in France.

These referees and linesmen are rigorously selected from approximately 30,000 officials in France, who referee throughout the year in leagues, departmental committees and clubs affiliated with the FFT. “This decision contributes to the uniqueness of Roland Garros, which is the last Grand Slam tournament to be based on line judges.”

The line judges at Roland Garros, a historical tradition

However, most players advocate that the automated system also be established in the French capital. Ben Figueiredo, director of hawk-eye innovations in tennis, understands the situation.

«It is the tournaments that decide if they want to use it or not. I know that Roland Garros likes to keep the line judges and see the referees get out of their chairs to go see the mark.

«The French really wonder if they really need it. Their referees are very experienced. In the four corners of the world, audiences have different ties to traditions.

Simply seeing the referee come down and show the mark to the players helps perpetuate this tradition. If Roland Garros decides to install hawk-eye, where all decisions are made in real time, the tournament will lose that human side,” adds Christopher Clarey, sports journalist and tennis author.

Discover the complete investigation

Discover the complete investigation “Technology in tennis: the challenges of a new arbitration, between tradition and dehumanized modernity”, which will be available in its entirety the weekend of December 13 at TennisTemple.

Last modification on 09/12/2025 at 8:53 p.m.

James Whitfield

James Whitfield is Archysport's racket sports and golf specialist, bringing a global perspective to tennis, badminton, and golf coverage. Based between London and Singapore, James has covered Grand Slam tournaments, BWF World Tour events, and major golf championships on five continents. His reporting combines on-the-ground access with deep knowledge of the technical and strategic elements that separate elite athletes from the rest of the field. James is fluent in English, French, and Mandarin, giving him unique access to athletes across the global tennis and badminton circuits.

Leave a Comment