BRATISLAVA – The Union of League Clubs on Wednesday informed about finding a potential substitute for the second round of the football conference league instead of Dunajská Streda.
The European Football Union excluded this for violation of multiple ownership of clubs within the European competition. The DAC appealed to the Sports Arbitration Court (CAS), which should have 10 days to decide. The club from Žitný island is owned by the same owner as another representative of the FC ETO Győr competition.
“Under the Union of League Clubs, there is an intensive discussion on a potential substitute that would replace the DAC 1904 in the second UEFA conference league qualifying round. So far we can talk about a potential alternate.
We still have no confirmed that another Slovak club will be able to start in the conference league instead of the DAC 1904. Moreover, we must all wait for the decision of the Sports Arbitration Court (CAS) in Lausanne, where the DAC 1904 appealed UEFA. He should have 10 days to make a decision, ” quoted ÚLK website niceliga.sk
DAC took fourth place in the highest Slovak competition last season and won the KL seat in the relegation, where he conquered Michalovce and Podbrezová. In addition to these three clubs, Košice fought for Europe.
“The UEFA will have the decisive word in this, the UEFA Conference League Management Organization. She added ÚLK.
Dunajská Streda was in the draw between the deployed teams and was supposed to meet the winner of the double match between the Armenian Urat and the Belarusian team Neman Grodno.
In addition, Slovakia is represented by the European Stage in the upcoming season Slovan Bratislava (2nd round LM), vice -champion MŠK Žilina (2nd round of KL) and holder of the Slovak Cup Spartak Trnava (1.
- Author: © List/
- Source: TASR
Related articles
Key Players & Events Impacting DAC dunajská Streda’s european Fate
The situation surrounding DAC Dunajská Streda and their potential exclusion from the UEFA Conference League is complex. To better understand the key factors and potential outcomes, we’ve compiled a concise table summarizing the crucial details:
| Factor | Details | Impact on DAC |
| —————————————– | ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————– | ——————————————————————————————————————————————- |
| Reason for Exclusion | violation of multi-club ownership rules within European competitions. DAC is owned by the same entity as FC ETO Győr. | Immediate exclusion from the second qualifying round of the Conference League. |
| Appeal to CAS | DAC has appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in Lausanne. | CAS decision is crucial. the ruling will determine DAC’s fate in this year’s competition. A positive outcome would reinstate DAC’s placement. |
| CAS Decision Timeline | CAS has 10 days from the date of the appeal to issue a ruling. | Uncertainty prevails until the CAS decision. This timeframe creates anticipation and speculation. |
| Potential Substitute Club | The Union of League Clubs (ÚLK) is discussing a potential replacement club.| Another Slovakian club may take DAC’s place in the Conference League should the CAS uphold the exclusion. |
| DAC’s Performance & Qualification | DAC finished fourth in the Slovakian league, earning them a spot in the Conference League qualifying rounds following victories over Michalovce and Podbrezová. | DAC’s on-field success is currently overshadowed by the off-field ownership issue. |
| Other Slovakian Teams in Europe | Slovan Bratislava (Champions league), MŠK Žilina (Conference League), and Spartak Trnava (Conference League). | the success of other Slovakian teams provides a broader picture of European footballing depiction. |
| Original Opponent | Winner of the match between Armenian Urartu and Belarusian Neman Grodno. | Uncertainty of the opponent remains since the DAC’s possible exclusion. |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
To address common queries from fans, here’s a detailed FAQ section:
Q: Why was DAC Dunajská Streda excluded from the UEFA Conference League?
A: They were excluded as of potential conflicts of interest regarding multi-club ownership. UEFA prohibits clubs with common ownership from competing in the same European competition. DAC shares ownership with FC ETO Győr.
Q: what is the role of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS)?
A: CAS is an self-reliant body that will rule on DAC’s appeal. Their decision will determine whether the exclusion stands or if DAC can participate in the Conference League.The CAS decision is final.
Q: When will we know the CAS ruling?
A: CAS has 10 days from the appeal date to make a decision. Keep an eye on official news sources for updates.
Q: If DAC is excluded, will another Slovakian team take their place?
A: The Union of League Clubs (ÚLK) is the governing body and is discussing the matter. If DAC’s exclusion is upheld by CAS, the ÚLK will determine a replacement.
Q: What are the implications for the Slovakian league if DAC is excluded?
A: while the Slovakian league will still be represented in European competitions,the exclusion of DAC,a prominent team,impacts the league’s prestige and revenue. It could also affect the coefficient ranking of the Slovakian league in UEFA’s standings.
Q: What were DAC’s achievements in the previous season to qualify for the Conference League?
A: DAC finished fourth in the Slovakian league and secured its place in the Conference League by winning playoff matches against Michalovce and Podbrezová.
Q: Who were DAC’s potential opponents in the Conference League?
A: They were drawn to play the winner of the match between Armenian team Urartu and the belarusian team Neman Grodno. However, due to the potential exclusion, this is subject to change.
Q: Where can I stay updated on the latest developments regarding DAC’s case?
A:* Follow official statements from UEFA, DAC Dunajská Streda, the CAS, and reputable sports news outlets.
