The former vice president of the Technical Committee of Referees (CTA), José María Enríquez Negreirahas denied having committed an alleged crime of money laundering with the 7.6 million euros he received from F.C. Barcelona.
In a writing, to which he has had access Digital Freedomsent to the head of the Court of Instruction No. 1 of Barcelona Joaquín Aguirre, the defense of Enríquez Negreira appeals the order of the judge who agreed to the opening of a separate piece on the alleged crime of money laundering committed by the former vice president of the CTA and his son, as well as the intermediation of TRESEP, SL and other commercial entities related to it.
According to the defense of Enríquez Negreira, “the appealed Order differentiates three factual blocks: 1) The payments made by the FCB to DASNIL 95 SL, NISALD SCP and SOCCERCAM SL.; 2) Everything related to TRESEP 2014, SL; and 3) Everything related to the destination given by “the Enríquez family” to the money received from the FCB. Except for errors in understanding of this part, it is argued in the resolution that from the facts related to blocks 2) and 3) the commission of a crime of money laundering and that, furthermore, those facts and that alleged crime would not be connected with the facts and typicalities related to block 1)”.
“This party understands that there are no indications of a crime of money laundering in relation to the monetary movements carried out within DASNIL and NILSAD. Even assuming as a hypothesis that the billing to the FCB by the companies of my client was illicit (whether it constitutes a crime of unfair administration, or a crime of corruption between individuals in the sports field), It is not possible to understand why the mere repayment of these amounts would constitute a crime of money laundering and would not constitute a mere exhaustion phase of the alleged crime. (whether it be unfair administration or corruption between individuals), especially when the destination of that money is not clear,” he adds.
“In any of the cases we do not share the absence of connection that is predicated between one event and another of the three artificially differentiated blocks, much less the affirmation that their separate prosecution cannot give rise to contradictory resolutions. Of course The destination of these funds reintegrated from DASNIL and NILSAD is closely linked to the characteristics that have been attributed (disloyal administration and corruption between individuals in the sports field) and the accusations should also have an interest in elucidating these facts together (and be able to participate in the entire investigation, since we understand that beyond the Public Prosecutor’s Office the other accusations would not have procedural legitimacy to be part in said piece of money laundering)”, he highlights.
About the money laundering attributed to his son
Enríquez Negreira’s appeal also refers to the accusation of money laundering against his son Javier Enríquez: “This part understands that, without entering into the debate of whether or not there are indications of a crime of money laundering in relation to the charges carried out by TRESEP, SL and the movements of the funds carried out by it, in any case There is no evidence that José María Enríquez Negreira had participated in those specific events.“.
“According to the proceedings, theThe commercial company that issued invoices to TRESEP SL was SOCCERCAM, in which my client did not have any corporate or factual participation.. None of the procedures carried out to date have shown that my client had participated in the billing of SOCCERCAM>TRESEP>FCB, nor in the movements of funds that TRESEP has subsequently carried out. The allusion made in the order appealed to The ‘Enríquez family’, without autonomously differentiating the conduct of the father and the son, we understand that it is typical of an author’s criminal law and contrary to the most basic principle of our penal system, which punishes only the act itself,” he points out.
“In short, there is no indication of the participation of José María Enríquez Negreira in relation to ‘the commissions charged by TRESEP SL and entities linked to Contreras for intermediating between Javier Enríquez Romero and FCBarcelona’,” he concludes.
2023-11-21 19:56:12
#Negreira #denies #laundered #money #million #received #Barcelona
