This Monday two things have been known, the first is that the police, according to the instruction prepared by the Ministry of the Interioryou can stop a football match if there are episodes of racism. For once and without serving as a precedent, the headline that accompanies the news that, among others, appears in the countryI thought it was very accurate: “The police will be able to stop a match to avoid another Vinicius case“. And it seems to me a very descriptive headline of the situation because if the department that directs Fernando Grande-Marlaska (hopefully for a short time) moves not because there are racist incidents in Spanish stadiums, which have been happening for a long time, but to prevent a specific black player from being persecuted on almost all soccer fields , that is, to prevent another athlete from being harassed and scolded as Vinicius has been to date.
I’ve been repeating it for a long time, the Vinicius case is special because of its uniqueness and because, to date, there has not been another case of similar persecution in the world to that of the Real Madrid footballer. He moves his Interior ass, in what I think is the swan song of the worst minister of that department in the entire democracy, and he does it to prevent him from doing with another kid what he has been doing with this one since he landed in our country but, in a very special way, for a year and a half here. Now all that remains is for the police to be allowed to act by the politicians but, whatever happens, the movement is already good in itself because, contrary to what the peri-Valencianism has been proclaiming in recent days, there is harassment against Vinicius, there was in Mestalla, also in the Camp Nou, in the Metropolitan, in Soin Moix, in the Sadar and in other Spanish fields. His situation is unique and has absolutely nothing to do with that of any other player in the world.
And, curiously, the other thing that has been known today, and that also concerns fallas journalism, is that the Investigating Court Number 48 of Madrid has Alex Baena’s complaint against Federico Valverde dismissed. The judge points out that there are inconsistencies in the statement of the Villarreal footballer, who stated, for example, that Valverde was with Odriozola when it turns out that, according to the images provided by Real Madrid, that is false. Baena also lied to his own club since, in a letter sent to Villarreal, the footballer stated that Fede Valverde had acknowledged the attack to the police when that is not true either. The alleged aggression was denied by Fede and also by Odriozola, who always spoke of a verbal brawl. Despite this, despite the fact that the ordinary courts have ordered the case to be archived, Sports justice calls for harsh punishment for the Madrid midfielderThis question seems very curious to me. Let’s see: Barcelona pays 7.3 million euros for 17 years to the vice president of the Technical Committee of Referees, but UEFA, I suppose protected because there is no judicial decision yet, allows the payer to compete in the Champions League while in the case of Valverde is the other way around, ordinary justice says that there is nothing, but the sports court asks for a harsh sanction for him. Does anyone understand? Me, of course, not.
So, what can we do now? Because We have been talking about Valverde’s attack on Baena for several months and today the judge has just said that the Villarreal footballer lied on several occasions. I haven’t heard Valverde talk about this, has anyone been able to do it? Today there is already talk of an alleged punch, something is something. But for a long time there has been talk of aggression in a very similar way as when, for two weeks, it was claimed that Juan Cala had insulted Diakhaby. There was no room for doubt. Today we are all Valverde or not? Or is this Monday the day he has to not believe in justice? Or is it that we only believe in justice when it gives us the reason? Or will there be those who have the tough face to continue saying that Valverde attacked but what happens is that justice has not been able or has not wanted to prove it? Are they Florentino’s threads? Or will they say that justice has also gone on vacation? By the way: as soon as they knew the version of their footballer, now denied by the judge, Villarreal lacked time to issue a statement affirming things that have now been seen to be false: When will another statement asking for forgiveness? Or will that not come? A month or so ago Fernando Roig said the following in Brand: “With the Valverde and Baena thing, I was about to leave for the United States.” Well, if you finally did it, you can come back now, President. You can come back now.
2023-07-03 16:26:24
#Today #Baena #longer #penultimate #raulista #alive
