“Falsified championship”, “financial doping”: Virton claims 5 million euros from Mouscron

Through eight points, specified in a non-exhaustive manner, the last of D1B notes that:

“- the RE Mouscron obscures the identity of the ultimate economic beneficiary of the club since it does not provide an organization chart of the legal structure of the club signed by this ultimate economic beneficiary, which is a violation of article 46 of the regulations of UEFA in terms of licensing, so the real role of Mr. Gérard Lopez remains unknown.

– In violation of Article 47 of the same UEFA regulations, RE Mouscron did not provide the auditor’s report on the audited consolidated annual accounts as of June 30, 2021, in a manner that satisfies the criteria set by UEFA and by the URBSFA regulations.

– The RE Mouscron has not provided proof that it is in order for payments and declarations for salaries, the ONSS, withholding tax, VAT, federal debts, stadium rents and bonuses concerning accidents at work.

– In this respect, this therefore means that BRP Mouscron owes very large amounts to all the persons and entities mentioned in the previous indent. With regard to the “federal debts”, it should be remembered that these are in particular debts due to the URBSFA itself as well as to other football clubs.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *