Tennis star expresses himself on Instagram: Djokovic denies knowingly false information and endangering others – sport

With a long statement via Instagram, tennis star Novak Djokovic himself made public statements for the first time since his entry problems to Australia, but caused further contradictions.

The 34-year-old number one in the tennis world rankings fought against two allegations on Wednesday around another training session in Melbourne Park: Neither did he deliberately give false information about his travel behavior in the 14 days before the flight to the host country of the coming Week beginning Australian Open, he still attended an event with children in December, knowing his positive corona test, and moved there without a mask.

[Wenn Sie alle aktuellen Entwicklungen zur Coronavirus-Pandemie live auf Ihr Handy haben wollen, empfehlen wir Ihnen unsere App, die Sie hier für Apple- und Android-Geräte herunterladen können.]

Djokovic described the “misinformation” that needed to be corrected as “hurtful and worrying to my family”. He wants to point out that he has tried very hard for the safety of others and compliance with test specifications. It was important to him to clarify all of this, but he would not comment on the incident out of respect for the Australian government.

However, the Serb also admitted that in an interview with the French sports newspaper “L’Equipe” on December 18, he already knew about his positive test result and still had not canceled the appointment. He just kept his distance and only removed his mask for the photographer. “Although I went home after the interview and went into isolation for the prescribed length of time, after thinking more carefully, that was a misjudgment and I understand that I should have postponed this commitment,” he wrote.

Djokovic speaks of a “human error” on the part of his agent

Djokovic was refused entry to Australia at Melbourne Airport last week because he was not vaccinated against the coronavirus and the documentation of his medical exemption was insufficient for the authorities. Because the border officials had not given him the agreed time to clarify, the decision was overturned during a court hearing on Monday.

The Australian immigration minister has since reserved the right to make use of his personal rights and still invalidate Djokovic’s visa. That decision is still pending.

Djokovic’s lawyers provided more information and documents on the matter, said the tennis pro and a spokesman for Minister Alex Hawke. “Of course, this has an impact on the time frame for a decision,” it said, according to the Australian media from the ministry.

The fact that it was incorrectly stated in his entry form that he had not traveled in the 14 days before his flight to Australia was described by Djokovic as a “human error” by his agent, “which was certainly not intentional”.

At the event with children, at which he appeared on December 17th and thus, according to previous information in the court documents, one day after “test and diagnosis” without a mask, he had not yet known about the positive result. He did a negative antigen test on December 16 and, out of sheer caution, also a PCR test. “I had no symptoms and felt fine and I received the news of the positive PCR test only after the event,” wrote Djokovic.

On Tuesday, among other things, the “Spiegel” reported new doubts: According to the magazine, the digital result of the positive test is dated December 26th. Documents from the Serbian Public Health Institute indicate that Djokovic was said to have tested positive on December 16.

The digital date seems strange because the evidence of his recovery, the negative test, is said to have been made on December 22nd. The serial numbers of the tests match. As a result, the negative test was carried out before the positive test, writes the “Spiegel”. It is of course also possible that the test result was manipulated.

It had already become known that the QR code on the document of the Serbian Institute for Public Health, which has since become public, showed different results at different times, such as the chief editor of “Racquet Magazine”, Ben Rothenberg, on Twitter writes: sometimes positive, sometimes negative.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *