In his most recent audio column of Big words, Carlos Antonio Velez He criticized Juan Carlos Osorio for his statements after the match against Deportes Tolima, in which América de Cali buried his options to fight the final of the League 2021-II. The journalist believes that the ‘Red Devils’ strategist sinned in his comments, in which he pointed to the rival’s game, and called for self-criticism.
“I heard and read the statements of Prof Osorio after the match against Deportes Tolima until yesterday (Tuesday). I’m used to it, that’s why I don’t usually listen to them because it’s the same bullshit. In Pékerman’s times it was a disaster that … cantinflas Later, we have had a person who knows a lot like Reinaldo Rueda, but who communicates very badly, “Velez said before going into the matter.
“They do not have self-criticism, they blame the media, journalists, referees and when they benefit they do not say anything, they talk very little about football, they talk about attitude, dedication … That of the desire has to be, it The rest is football and little is said about that, and when we talk about how it happened in the case of Osorio, we are left owing. Professor, if you have something, you know a lot; That he cannot express it in his teams, among others, due to his stubbornness, is another thing. I acknowledge your knowledge, so the demand has to be greater. You stayed in devaluing your rival, “he added.
Vélez spoke of the statistics of the posh cast against Millonarios in Ibagué and Bogotá, not counting the two games against América, to tell Osorio once again that “don’t you think that this data indicates the opposite of what you say? He affirmed? Against yourself, when they lost Malagón, the goal they score is taking them in defense of containment (…) In duels they also win. There, you were not very fair, the elaboration does not have to go through many touches. You know it. “
He continued saying that “he would have dedicated that space better than to the signaling, which is also human and was downloaded … it is unfair because you know that Tolima has done things correctly, you told a part of that way of playing. You ignored and cut the possibility of expressing something else in relation to his particular way of seeing the game in America “.
Finally, Vélez made a new call to self-criticism: “One cannot put the pianist to play the drums. First we do self-criticism and then we prosecute the others (…) Professor exaggerated, yes, very nice that he had praised Hernán Torres, but it is very ugly that he would have talked about a way of playing, which, like his, is so old. This is a way of playing as valid as any other “.
.
