Chief judge Pavel Orel.
Jaroslav Ožana, CTK
1 – 0. Karvinský Daniel Stropek struck a 30 meter free kick home 35 minutes into the match. “The ball hit the hand in an unnatural position due to the movement of the body, so it was an offense,” said Libor Kovařík, a member of the jury, in a video on the FACR website.
In the 78th minute, after 1: 1 Orel did not correctly recognize the goal of Lukáš Čmelík due to an offensive foul on goalkeeper Milan Knobloch. In the setting, the guest Júsuf Hilál decided on the victory of Liberec 2: 1.
Slovan decided with a goal of alternating Hilál in the setting
According to the commission, the referees did not make a mistake in Teplice either, which faced a penalty against Pardubice twice in short succession. Judge Ladislav Szikszay first ordered a penalty kick after 74 minutes after a free kick by Martin Chlumecký.
David Huf didn’t convert the penalty, but at the arrival Štěpán Krunert fouled Mojmír Chytil and Východočeši, after reviewing the situation from the record, got the advantage of another penalty kick. Lukáš Červ increased it to 2: 0 for Pardubice, which won 2: 1. “Even the second penalty kick was ordered correctly. It was a kick, the so-called pedal,” said Kovařík. According to him, Hradec Králové also played a penalty in a 2: 2 draw in Olomouc.
In Ostrava, in the eighth minute, the referees did not recognize the home team’s goalkeeper Ladislav Almási 1: 0 due to the fact that the assistant waved offside. “Given that we do not have a calibrated offside line, this decision of the referees cannot be contradicted,” said Kovařík.
Viktoria lost the two-goal lead, Baník scored a point
The referees did not make a mistake in the 32nd minute, when Jan Petřík correctly ordered a penalty for the guests for kicking into Jan Kopice after a intervention by a video referee for Plzeň. Baník demanded a penalty kick after 54 minutes after the ball fell on the edge of the lime to the hand of Lukáš Hejda and then Tomáš Chorý. According to the commission, however, it was not a penalty.
“In the case of Hejda, it was an offense because the ball hit a hand in an unnatural position due to body movement. The patient had his hand in a natural position and could not respond to the ball’s reflection, so in this case it was not an offense. that Hejda played with his hand rather outside the penalty area, so a direct free kick should have been ordered, “said Kovařík.
Judge Petřík erred in the third minute of the setting, when he had to give the guest Beauguel a second yellow card for hitting the opponent’s head with his elbow and excluding him. Pilsen lost its two-goal lead in Ostrava and drew 2: 2.
.
