In the “required” DNU signed by Marconcini, because that is how he defines it after the city’s Prevention and Health committees have warned him of the dangerous movement of Oliveros people on the field, and before the League does not take measures, It prohibited precisely that and requested that the players of both Sportivo Belgrano campuses (reserve and first) present negative swabs. In response to the request, the visit argued that this would not be possible due to the high cost and then there San Genaro made the resources available to do so. There was another refusal from the people of Oliveros and it was waited until Sunday, to see if they would finally come with the tests. At the same time, Club Sportivo Rivadavia decided, as a “sign of good will to want to play the game”, According to the words of its president Gabriel Pujol (son) a few days ago to this newspaper, that his people did not enter the club either since the visit argued “sports advantage” if this happened and despite the fact that San Genaro has no cases.
Equipment
Sports Advertising
On Sunday, match day, the story added new chapters: Oliveros players did not present the swabs that the city required for their entry, but they were still allowed to play the games. Reserve and first, while the fans of the premises, knowing that they could not enter, were placed in the streets surrounding the soccer field (dirt streets that are very, very close) and they encouraged from there. There are those who speak of a quiet day and there are those who point out that there were some disturbances.
When the first half was draining and Sportivo Rivadavia won 3 to 0 (guaranteeing access to the semifinals in the absence of a couple of dates for the closing of the regular phase while the visit is still fighting to get among the best four), A Sportivo Belgrano player was about to take a corner, but he grabbed the ball and went to talk to the referee. He accused a verbal assault from the outside and the judge ended the first part. From there there was more than an hour of discussion in the locker room: delegates, referees, police, captains. If the conditions were in place, yes, no. In principle, the police and the referees (the main of the shortlist Brian Ferreira) would have given guarantees to continue, but Belgrano decided not to play anymore. And he left.
Match 2
TV capture
Like an eternal party this week the controversy continues: from Sportivo Rivadavia they prefer not to speak until they wait for the Totorense Regional League to release the court report, to know if they also give him or not the three points that he was leading on the court. And on the other hand They expect the same in Belgrano de Oliveros and with the alert placed on a possible claim if things do not convince them. After said meeting (this Tuesday night), the release of the clubs will be awaited. From Oliveros they argue who did not continue playing because their players received attacks: in reserve a stone without aim and first, discriminatory insults. They also say that the local club finally had some people on the premises who should not be there and that they were treated with contempt, until a leader denied one of them water. They claim “arrogance”, “bad manners” and “discrimination all week long.”
For your part and beyond what the league finally says, the mayor of San Genaro Gastón Marconcini warned that he will file a criminal complaint against the visiting club for “attacking the health of the locals”, since “the players refused to swab themselves, we had the whole operation set up and they refused.” For him, clearly, “they never intended to play the game” and everything else came from it. That seems like a story by Fontanarrosa, although it is full of reality in a context of a pandemic that does not end.
