Imputation and psychiatric expertise, the prosecutor’s request for the tennis teacher denounced for sexual abuse of a minor – News

In mid-May, it was learned that -one month before- a complaint had been received in the courts of Concordia against a 27-year-old from Concordia, who worked as a tennis instructor at the Club Social y Deportivo Federación and had been accused of having abused a girl who was part of his student body.
Always according to that complaint, the abuse would have been committed in the city of Concordia, at the beginning of this 2021, when the suspect brought a delegation of boys to participate in a tennis match and lodged them in his apartment.

The case came to light after the minor herself told the incident to a Federation doctor, who decided to notify the family first and then go to court to file a complaint.

From there, from the Public Prosecutor’s Office, Dr. Josefina Penon requested a series of measures for the preparation of evidence to clarify the fact. For example, a Gesell camera audience to listen to the girl’s testimony and a later verification of the place where the narration allegedly happened, where sketches were made and photographs were taken.

Thus, with the elements that it already has in its possession, the prosecutor requested the imputation of the accused (identified as Juan Martín Vera) and took a statement from him, in a hearing in which the tennis instructor was accompanied by Dr. Oscar Bacigaluppe, as defense attorney.

According to the magistrate, the title page of the case is identified with the name of the accused and the alleged crime of “simple sexual abuse, without carnal access, aggravated.”

Likewise, Dr. Sergio Rondoni Caffa (Judge of Federal Guarantees) was requested a series of inhibitory measures and prevention of contact with the victim’s family, discarding a request for preventive detention, because for Justice there would be “no danger of escape or obstruction of the cause ”.

Finally, it was pointed out that the formation of a cabinet is now expected to carry out a psychological and psychiatric examination on the accused, which was already authorized by the judge, but the defendant’s defense asked to know the “methodology” with which it would be carried out. forward said examination, since you have the power to refuse to take it.

Regardless of this, the Prosecutor’s Office will then evaluate whether the elements it already has in its possession are sufficient to request an elevation in the judgment of the case.