Daniil Medvedev has called for a shift toward a best-of-three-sets format in Grand Slam tournaments, arguing that the current five-set structure is less favorable than the standard used across the rest of the ATP circuit. The Russian, who recently triumphed at the Hangzhou Open and is currently competing at the China Open in Beijing, stated during a press conference that he would opt for shorter matches if given the choice, despite his willingness to adapt to either format.
The debate regarding the length of major matches has intensified recently as players manage a rigorous calendar. While Medvedev acknowledged that the five-set format is deeply rooted in tennis history, he noted that his preference has remained consistent since he was young. “I think that it undoubtedly diminishes the historical value of the Grand Slam tournaments,” Medvedev said, while clarifying that he remains a professional who will perform regardless of the rules in place. “If you ask for my opinion, I would opt for the best of three.”
ATP Players Debate Grand Slam Traditions
The conversation surrounding match length has sparked varied responses among the top players currently in Beijing. Zverev remarked that he is unaware of any players who would prefer the best-of-three format, adding a lighthearted comment about Novak Djokovic potentially favoring shorter matches due to his age.
Carlos Alcaraz has also voiced his opposition to changing the format. “We would destroy the legacy of Grand Slam tournaments,” Alcaraz said, noting that the five-set requirement is what makes major championships special and different from the rest of the tour.
Players Debate Physical Strain Versus Tennis Tradition
The discussion highlights the tension between the physical strain on athletes and the tradition of the game. While some suggest a middle-ground approach—such as playing best-of-three until the quarterfinals—Medvedev maintains that he is comfortable adapting to whatever decision the governing bodies make.
For players like Zverev, the physical challenge is a badge of honor. He pointed out that the sport has thrived under these rules since 1877, and that the physical preparation required for such marathons is a defining characteristic of a professional tennis player’s career.
Future of the Five-Set Format
Despite the differing opinions, there is no immediate indication that the Grand Slams—the Australian Open, Roland-Garros, Wimbledon, and the US Open—plan to move away from the five-set format for men’s singles. The debate remains a point of regular discussion among the professional ranks, with players weighing the benefits of recovery and longevity against the historical significance of the sport’s most demanding matches.
Medvedev continues his season in Beijing, focusing on his performance following his recent title in Hangzhou. His next scheduled appearances will serve as a checkpoint for his form as he competes through the Asian swing, with the ATP tour moving toward the year-end finals in Turin.
Do Players Support Keeping the Five-Set Format?
Do all players support keeping the five-set format?
No, opinions are divided. While players like Carlos Alcaraz and Alexander Zverev strongly defend the five-set tradition, Daniil Medvedev has publicly stated a personal preference for the best-of-three-sets format, though he remains adaptable to current rules.
Has there been a formal proposal to change the rules?
There have been various discussions and suggestions, including proposals mentioned by Novak Djokovic regarding shorter sets, but no governing body has officially moved to change the Grand Slam match format from the traditional best-of-five sets for men’s singles.
Why do some players want to change the format? Proponents of change argue that shorter matches could help players remain healthier throughout the season.
