Chelsea suffered their first defeat of the 2026–2027 Premier League season on Sunday, falling 1–2 to defending champions Arsenal at the Emirates Stadium. Following the match, former Manchester United full-back Ashley Young publicly criticized manager Xabi Alonso for deploying two natural right-backs in central midfield during the London derby.
The tactical decision immediately drew scrutiny as the Blues failed to contain Arsenal’s midfield dominance. Morgan Rogers had given Chelsea a quick start with a goal in the second minute, but Arsenal quickly responded through Kai Havertz in the 25th minute before Martin Odegaard netted the winner in the 50th minute, according to match reports.
Tactical Gamble in the Middle Backfires
Xabi Alonso opted for an unusual setup in the center of the pitch. Romeo Lavia started as the lone traditional central midfielder, paired alongside Reece James, whose natural position is right-back. The experiment failed to disrupt Arsenal’s rhythm, as James struggled to track Martin Odegaard’s movement.
Rather than introducing a specialist midfielder from the bench to regain control, Alonso brought on another right-back, Malo Gusto, to partner James in the heart of the pitch. The adjustment choked Chelsea’s attacking creativity, forcing the team to rely almost exclusively on counterattacks. Prior to kickoff, Alonso had praised James for possessing the technical potential to transition into a midfielder.
Ashley Young Questions Alonso’s Setup
Speaking on the tactical approach, Ashley Young pointed out that Chelsea entered the campaign with a distinct calendar advantage over their rivals by not participating in European competition this season.
“Chelsea not playing in European competition this year means they have fewer fixtures and can focus fully on the Premier League,” Young stated. “However, the concerning part is that when you finish playing against the champions, you see two right-backs playing in central midfield.”
Young also highlighted the physical fragility of the squad, noting that Lavia spent substantial portions of the previous season sidelined with injuries. While acknowledging the threat posed by Chelsea’s frontline, Young argued that playing makeshift central midfielders severely limits their overall ceiling.
Over-Reliance on Deep Defending and Counterattacks
Beyond midfield selection, Young criticized Chelsea’s tendency to sit deep and absorb pressure rather than contesting possession. The defensive block left exploitable gaps between the lines that Arsenal routinely punished.

“Other teams will watch today’s match and see that Chelsea tends to defend by packing players behind the ball, yet gaps remain between their lines, and Arsenal capitalized on that,” Young observed. He added that Pedro Neto provided the visitors’ only genuinely dangerous counterattacking moment during the second half.
Keep reading