National football teams frequently deviate from their primary colors due to “kit clashes,” a regulation enforced by FIFA and continental governing bodies to ensure players, officials, and spectators can clearly distinguish between opposing teams. For the Belgium national team, known as the Rode Duivels (Red Devils), this means wearing white or alternative colors when their traditional red shirts conflict with an opponent’s primary kit, while Senegal often avoids its traditional green in favor of white or yellow to meet similar visibility standards.
Why the Belgian Red Devils don’t always wear red
The Belgian national team utilizes a primary red home kit, but FIFA’s Equipment Regulations mandate that the two teams in a match must be “clearly distinguishable” from one another. According to these rules, if both teams have primary colors that are too similar, the “second team” (the visiting team or the team designated as such by the match officials) must change their colors.
Belgium often switches to a white away kit to avoid these clashes. This is common when facing teams with red home jerseys, such as England, Spain, or Switzerland. In some instances, the team has also utilized third kits in shades of blue or yellow to provide further contrast. These decisions are finalized during the pre-match coordination between the two teams’ kit managers and the refereeing crew to ensure no confusion occurs on the pitch.
Why Senegal avoids green in specific matchups
Senegal’s primary identity is tied to the green of its national flag, but the team frequently fields a white or yellow kit. Under FIFA guidelines, green is often considered a “clash” color not only with other green-clad teams (like Algeria or Nigeria in certain iterations) but also with the pitch itself. While the grass is naturally green, certain shades of neon or forest green can blend into the background, affecting the visibility of the players for officials and broadcasters.
The Senegalese Football Federation (FSF) typically designates white as the primary alternative. This ensures a sharp contrast against almost any opponent. In tournaments like the Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) or the FIFA World Cup, where multiple teams may share similar primary palettes, the “color clash” rule forces the team designated as the away side to abandon their traditional green in favor of their secondary or tertiary options.
How FIFA determines who changes colors
The process of deciding which team must switch to an alternative kit is not random. According to FIFA’s official match protocols, the home team generally has the first right to wear their primary colors. If the home team’s kit clashes with the visiting team’s primary kit, the visiting team is required to wear their change (away) kit.
If the visiting team’s away kit also clashes with the home team’s primary colors, the visiting team must use a third kit or, in rare cases, a neutral color provided by the organizers. This is why fans often see the Red Devils in white during away fixtures in Europe, regardless of whether the opponent’s primary color is a direct match for red.
For readers unfamiliar with the terminology, a “kit clash” occurs when the saturation and hue of two jerseys are too similar for a referee to distinguish players quickly during fast-paced play, which could lead to incorrect foul calls or offside decisions.
Comparing the Kit Strategies
Both Belgium and Senegal follow a similar logic of prioritization, but their specific color hurdles differ based on their primary identities.
| Team | Primary Color | Common Alternative | Primary Reason for Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belgium | Red | White / Blue | Opponent’s primary red kit |
| Senegal | Green | White / Yellow | Opponent’s green kit or pitch blending |
The impact of commercial kits and thirds
The introduction of “third kits” has reduced the frequency of neutral-color substitutions. Brands like Adidas and Nike now provide national teams with a third option that is often aesthetically distinct from both the home and away kits. This gives teams like Belgium more flexibility, allowing them to maintain a brand identity even when red and white are not viable options.
These third kits are not just for fashion; they serve as a critical fail-safe for tournament play where schedules are tight and multiple teams with similar colors may be grouped together in the same stage of a competition.
The next opportunity to see these kit regulations in action will be during the upcoming international break and qualifying windows, where match officials will again determine the designated “home” and “away” colors based on the official FIFA match sheets.
Do you think national teams should stick to their primary colors regardless of clashes? Let us know in the comments.
Keep reading
