Paraguayan Senator Celeste Amarilla Faces Backlash After Insulting Kylian Mbappé
Paraguayan Senator Celeste Amarilla is under scrutiny for a series of social media posts targeting France national team captain Kylian Mbappé. Following Paraguay’s defeat on Saturday, Amarilla described the striker as a “colonized Cameroonian, pretending to be French, resentful, nouveau riche, arrogant and ugly.”
Who is Celeste Amarilla?
Celeste Amarilla is a member of the Paraguayan Senate. While she holds a high-ranking political office in Asunción, her recent public commentary has shifted from legislative matters to sports-related attacks. Her posts followed a match in which the Paraguayan national team suffered a loss, sparking a reaction that targeted Mbappé’s heritage and personal character rather than the sporting result.
What did the Senator say about Kylian Mbappé?
The controversy centers on a social media post published after Paraguay’s Saturday defeat. Amarilla directed a string of personal insults at the French captain, specifically referencing his Cameroonian roots. She labeled him a “colonized Cameroonian” and alleged he was “pretending to be French.” The Senator further characterized Mbappé as “resentful,” “nouveau riche,” “arrogant,” and “ugly.”
These comments have drawn widespread condemnation across social media platforms, with critics pointing to the racial and xenophobic undertones of the language used by a sitting government official.
Why this matters for the sport and politics
The incident highlights a friction point between political figures and the global nature of modern football. Mbappé, born in Bondy, France, to a Cameroonian father and an Algerian mother, has frequently been a target of identity-based attacks despite being the face of the French national team. When a government representative uses such language, it elevates a sporting disappointment into a diplomatic and social issue.
For global readers, this reflects a broader trend of political figures in South America using social media to vent frustrations over national team performances, though the specific nature of Amarilla’s insults exceeds standard sporting criticism.
How the public and football community have responded
Reactions have been swift, with fans and journalists calling for accountability. The use of the term “colonized” is particularly contentious, as it invokes the history of imperialism and racial hierarchy. Most of the backlash has centered on the irony of a senator—tasked with representing the law and the people—engaging in targeted harassment of an athlete.
While the French Football Federation (FFF) has not issued a formal diplomatic statement on the matter, the visibility of the posts has ensured that the incident remains a talking point within the international football community.
What happens next for Celeste Amarilla?
It remains unclear if the Paraguayan Senate will take internal disciplinary action against Amarilla. Typically, such outbursts are handled as personal conduct issues unless they trigger official diplomatic complaints from another sovereign state. As of now, no official sanctions have been announced by the Paraguayan government.
The next confirmed checkpoint for the Paraguayan national team will be their next scheduled fixture, where the focus is expected to return to the pitch, provided the political fallout from Amarilla’s comments does not escalate further.
Do you think political figures should face sanctions for social media conduct regarding athletes? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
)