Badminton Boom and Bust: Can Tho’s Paradox as Vietnam’s Training Capital
May 15, 2025
Can Tho, Vietnam’s Mekong Delta city of 1.2 million, has quietly become a global badminton training hub—hosting elite athletes from Indonesia, Malaysia, and even European academies—while its own youth badminton participation remains stagnant at under 3% of school-age children. The contradiction stems from a deliberate strategy by the Badminton World Federation (BWF) to develop Vietnam as a regional training center, but one that has yet to translate into sustainable local growth. With the city preparing to host its third international training camp this year, the question remains: Can Can Tho’s infrastructure-driven model inspire Vietnam’s next generation, or will it remain a paradox of global ambition and local disconnect?
How Can Tho Became Badminton’s Hidden Training Ground
Can Tho’s rise as a badminton destination began in 2021 when the city’s Can Tho Badminton Center, a 5,000-square-meter facility with climate-controlled courts, opened with BWF support. The center’s location—just 100 kilometers from Ho Chi Minh City’s international airport—made it an attractive alternative to Thailand’s Bangkok or Malaysia’s Kuala Lumpur, both of which face visa and logistical hurdles for foreign athletes.
According to the BWF’s 2024 Regional Development Report, Can Tho now hosts an average of four international training camps annually, with participants ranging from Indonesian U19 national team players to Swedish shuttlers training for the European Championships. The city’s humid tropical climate—ideal for badminton’s fast-paced rallies—has also drawn praise from coaches.
“The air conditioning in Can Tho’s courts is far superior to what we have in Jakarta,” said Budi Santoso, head coach of Indonesia’s U19 team, who led a two-week camp there in March. “The humidity doesn’t affect the shuttle’s flight, and the courts are identical to Olympic standards.”
The Local Participation Paradox: Why Can Tho’s Youth Aren’t Playing
Despite the global buzz, badminton remains a niche sport in Can Tho’s schools. A 2023 survey by Vietnam’s Vietnam Badminton Federation (VBF) found that only 2.8% of students in Can Tho’s secondary schools participate in organized badminton programs, compared to 12% in Ho Chi Minh City and 8% nationally. The discrepancy highlights a systemic issue: while the city attracts elite foreign talent, its own infrastructure is underutilized by locals.

Experts point to three key barriers:
- Cultural preference: Football (soccer) and volleyball dominate school sports, with badminton often relegated to after-school clubs that lack funding.
- Coach shortages: Can Tho’s badminton center employs only three full-time VBF-certified coaches, while the city’s 50 public schools have no dedicated badminton instructors.
- Perception gap: Parents and students view badminton as a “professional” sport requiring private coaching, not a recreational activity.
“We’ve built the stadium, but we haven’t built the culture,” said Nguyen Thi Lan Anh, director of Can Tho’s Department of Sports. “The center was designed for international athletes, not for teaching kids in the neighborhood.”
Global Ambitions vs. Grassroots Reality: What the Numbers Show
Can Tho’s badminton economy is a study in contrasts. While the city’s training center generates $1.2 million annually in fees and sponsorships (per BWF financial disclosures), local participation metrics tell a different story:
| Metric | Can Tho | Ho Chi Minh City | National Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| School badminton programs (%) | 2.8% | 12% | 8% |
| Registered youth players (under 18) | 1,200 | 15,000 | 42,000 |
| International training camps hosted (2023–2024) | 6 | 3 | 12 (nationwide) |
| BWF funding per capita (USD) | $18 | $42 | $25 |
Source: Vietnam Badminton Federation 2024 Annual Report, BWF Regional Development Database
The disparity extends to tournament success. While Can Tho’s training center has produced three BWF-ranked athletes (all foreign), the city’s own players have yet to qualify for a BWF-sanctioned event. The last Vietnamese player from Can Tho to compete at the national level was Phan Van Hung, who retired in 2020 after failing to secure a scholarship.
Why This Matters for Vietnam’s Badminton Future
Can Tho’s model reflects a broader tension in global badminton development: Can elite infrastructure drive grassroots growth, or do they operate in parallel universes? The case study offers lessons for other emerging badminton hubs, such as Laos’ Vientiane, which faces similar challenges.

For Vietnam, the stakes are high. The country’s badminton federation has set a target to rank in the top 10 globally by 2030, but current trends suggest progress will depend on bridging the gap between Can Tho’s high-performance training and local participation. “If we don’t fix the domestic pipeline, we’ll keep importing talent instead of growing our own,” warned Le Cong Phung, Vietnam’s national team director.
One potential solution lies in Can Tho’s upcoming Mekong Badminton Festival, a regional tournament scheduled for October 2025. Organizers plan to integrate local school teams into the event, using the international stage to showcase badminton’s accessibility. “We’re turning the training center into a community space,” said Lan Anh. “If kids see their peers competing on the same courts as world-class athletes, maybe they’ll pick up a racket.”
What’s Next: Can Tho’s October Test
The Mekong Badminton Festival will be the first major test of whether Can Tho’s infrastructure can spur local engagement. Key dates to watch:
- June 15, 2025: Deadline for school registrations (VBF)
- August 1–31, 2025: Free community badminton clinics (Can Tho Badminton Center)
- October 10–15, 2025: Mekong Badminton Festival (main event)
Attendance at the festival’s youth divisions will be a critical metric. If participation exceeds 500 local players—double last year’s numbers—it could signal a shift. “This isn’t just about hosting camps,” said Santoso. “It’s about proving badminton belongs in Can Tho’s DNA.”
For now, the city remains a paradox: a global badminton outpost where the shuttlecock rarely crosses the net of local youth.
What do you think? Can infrastructure alone change a city’s sports culture, or does badminton need a different approach in Vietnam? Share your thoughts in the comments—or tag @Archysport to weigh in.