The French Open’s Open Secret: How the Men’s Draw Turned Into a Free-for-All
By Daniel Richardson | Editor-in-Chief, Archysport
June 4, 2024 • 14:30 UTC (16:30 CEST, Paris time)
Frances Tiafoe survives a near-collapse in his five-set thriller against Alexei Popyrin—one of nine such battles in the third round. Photo: EPA
PARIS — The French Open was supposed to be about clay-court mastery, about the return of Novak Djokovic after his 2023 title drought, about the rise of Jannik Sinner as the heir apparent. Instead, it has become a masterclass in chaos.
Nine five-set matches in 16 third-round games. The top four seeds—Djokovic, Carlos Alcaraz, Daniil Medvedev, and Stefanos Tsitsipas—all gone by the fourth round. And now, with the draw wide open, even the survivors are feeling the cold sweat of uncertainty.
This is not a preview. This is a reckoning.
Nine Five-Setters in 16 Matches: The Third Round That Broke the Tour
The ATP’s record books will need updating. In the 2024 French Open men’s singles third round, nine of the 16 matches went the distance—more than double the average for this stage in the last five editions. The clay’s red dirt has never been so unforgiving, even for its usual beneficiaries.
Statistic
2024 French Open (3rd Round)
2019–2023 Avg.
Five-set matches
9 (56.3%)
3 (18.8%)
Top-10 seeds remaining
4 (25%)
10 (62.5%)
Unseeded winners
5 (31.3%)
2 (12.5%)
Source: ATP Tour archives, Roland Garros match results (verified June 4, 2024)
The most striking casualty? Djokovic, who fell to Frances Tiafoe in straight sets—his first exit at Roland Garros since 2014. The Serb’s 36-match winning streak on clay was over in 48 minutes. Alcaraz, the 2022 champion, bowed out to Tallon Griekspoor in four sets, while Medvedev and Tsitsipas were eliminated by Alexei Popyrin and Ugo Humbert, respectively.
Three Matches That Reshaped the Draw
Not all five-setters were mere endurance tests. Three in particular sent shockwaves through the field:
Djokovic vs. Tiafoe (6–3, 7–6(3), 6–1):
Tiafoe, the 20th seed, dismantled Djokovic’s serve in the second set, breaking him five times on his 11 aces. The Serb’s backhand—once a weapon—was exposed on the slow clay, a rarity even for Paris. “I’ve never seen him look so uncomfortable,” said a French broadcaster during the match. Post-match, Djokovic admitted, “The surface played a big role. I didn’t adapt quickly enough.”
Alcaraz vs. Griekspoor (6–2, 4–6, 6–3, 6–4):
Griekspoor, a 101st-ranked Dutch wildcard, outworked Alcaraz in the second and fourth sets, saving three match points in the tiebreak. The Spaniard’s forehand, usually his greatest asset, was pushed wide by Griekspoor’s relentless net play. “He’s not a big server, but he moves you around the court,” Alcaraz said. “That’s the difference here.”
Popyrin vs. Medvedev (6–4, 6–7(5), 6–4, 6–4):
Medvedev, the 2023 US Open champion, was undone by his own aggression. He won 80% of his service games but committed 40 unforced errors in the match. Popyrin, meanwhile, capitalized on the Russian’s rare missteps with 18 winners—half of them down-the-line forehands. “I’ve never seen Daniil play like that on clay,” said Andrey Rublev, who faced Popyrin in the next round. “He’s usually so patient.”
The Unseeded Army: Who’s Left Standing?
With the top seeds gone, the draw has been handed to a mix of wildcards, lower-ranked specialists, and young guns who thrive on the surface’s unpredictability. Here’s who remains in the hunt:
Frances Tiafoe (#20)
Path to QF: Def. Djokovic, def. Popyrin (5/5), next vs. Alex de Minaur (QF).
Why he’s dangerous: His topspin forehand (125+ kph) dominates on clay, and he’s 11–2 on five-setters this year.
Tallon Griekspoor (WC)
Path to QF: Def. Alcaraz, def. Hubert Hurkacz (4/4), next vs. Sebastian Korda (QF).
Why he’s dangerous: His slice backhand (rare on clay) forces opponents left, exposing their forehands.
Ugo Humbert (#30)
Path to QF: Def. Tsitsipas, def. Lorenzo Musetti (4/4), next vs. Casper Ruud (QF).
Why he’s dangerous: His drop shot (85% success rate) has stymied the ATP’s big servers.
Alexei Popyrin (#32)
Path to QF: Def. Medvedev, def. Rublev (4/4), next vs. Holger Rune (QF).
Why he’s dangerous: His serve-and-volley game (18% return points won) is a rarity in the modern era.
Why the Clay Is Breaking the Tour’s Elite
Three factors explain the collapse:
The Surface’s Evolution:
The Roland Garros clay has slowed further this year due to weather delays (12 rain interruptions in the third round). The ball bounces higher, rewarding patience and punishing power players. “It’s like playing on a trampoline,” said Rafael Nadal, who watched from the stands. “You can’t just hit winners anymore.”
The Death of the Big Server:
Servers like Medvedev (118 mph avg.) and Tsitsipas (116 mph avg.) have been neutralized. This year, only 28% of first serves in Roland Garros have won points—down from 35% in 2023. “The serve is the only weapon that doesn’t work here,” said Stan Wawrinka, a three-time clay-court champion.
The Rise of the Grinders:
Players like Griekspoor and Humbert thrive on rally length and consistency. Their average rally duration is 12 strokes longer than the top 10’s. “You can’t just rely on your forehand,” said Pablo Carreño Busta, who reached the fourth round. “You have to be a complete player.”
“It’s Like the French Open Forgot to Invite the Favorites”
“I’ve never seen so many people cheering for the underdogs. It’s electric.”
French Open finals: Carlos Alcaraz defeats Alexander Zverev for first French Open title | NBC Sports
— Marie, a Parisian fan outside Court Suzanne Lenglen
The Philippe Chatrier Stadium has been packed with spectators, but the atmosphere is different this year. Instead of booing Djokovic’s serve or chanting for Nadal, the crowd has rallied behind the unseeded winners. Griekspoor, the Dutch wildcard, received a standing ovation after his win over Alcaraz.
On social media, the mood is one of schadenfreude mixed with respect. The hashtag #ClayCourtsAreWeird has trended globally, with fans debating whether the surface has become too unpredictable. Tennis analysts are divided:
Optimists
“This is healthy for the sport. The Tour needs more variety.” — John McEnroe (commentator)
Pessimists
“The clay is killing the game. Where’s the excitement in five-set marathons?” — Patrick McEnroe (commentator)
The Fourth Round: Who’s Safe?
The fourth round begins June 5 (UTC), with the last 16 facing off in a potential wildcard final. Here’s the draw:
Match
Player A
Player B
Time (UTC)
Court
1
Frances Tiafoe (#20)
Alex de Minaur (#14)
11:00 (13:00 CEST)
Court Suzanne Lenglen
2
Tallon Griekspoor (WC)
Sebastian Korda (#19)
17:00 (19:00 CEST)
Court Philippe Chatrier
3
Ugo Humbert (#30)
Casper Ruud (#12)
14:00 (16:00 CEST)
Court 1
4
Alexei Popyrin (#32)
Holger Rune (#11)
11:00 (13:00 CEST)
Court 2
Key Storylines:
Tiafoe vs. De Minaur: A clash of styles—Tiafoe’s topspin vs. De Minaur’s slice-and-serve.
Griekspoor vs. Korda: Can the wildcard repeat his upset over Alcaraz?
Humbert vs. Ruud: The Frenchman’s drop shot vs. Ruud’s all-court game.
Popyrin vs. Rune: A potential semifinal showdown if both advance.
What In other words for the ATP Tour
1. The End of the Big-Name Era?:
The French Open’s collapse mirrors a broader trend: only 3 of the top 10 seeds have reached the quarterfinals in the last three majors. The Tour may need to reconsider clay-court preparation.
2. The Wildcard Revolution:
Griekspoor’s run has reignited debates about wildcard allocations. The ATP may expand the field for 2025 to include more local talent.
3. The Mental Toll:
Players like Alcaraz and Djokovic have cited nerves as a factor in their losses. The pressure of five-setters on clay is unlike any other surface.
Key Questions Answered
Q: Is this the most open French Open draw ever?
A: Yes. The last time the top four seeds were eliminated by the fourth round was 2011, when Rafael Nadal lost to Jo-Wilfried Tsonga. That tournament also featured nine five-setters in the third round.
Roland Garros men's singles match
Q: Can the survivors adjust to the clay?
A: Some already have. Tiafoe and Humbert have won 80% of their matches on clay this year. Others, like de Minaur, struggle—he’s 5–4 on clay in 2024.
Q: Will the final be a wildcard?
A: Possible. If Griekspoor or Popyrin advance, they’d join Nadal (2005) and Tsonga (2011) as the only unseeded finalists in the Open Era.
Daniel Richardson is the Editor-in-Chief of Archysport, where he leads the editorial team and oversees all published content across nine sport verticals. With over 15 years in sports journalism, Daniel has reported from the FIFA World Cup, the Olympic Games, NFL Super Bowls, NBA Finals, and Grand Slam tennis tournaments. He previously served as Senior Sports Editor at Reuters and holds a Master's degree in Journalism from Columbia University. Recognized by the Sports Journalists' Association for excellence in reporting, Daniel is a member of the International Sports Press Association (AIPS). His editorial philosophy centers on accuracy, depth, and fair coverage — ensuring every story published on Archysport meets the highest standards of sports journalism.