US Urges EU Not to Alter AI Act for Pax Silica, Warns of Falling Behind in AI Race

Brussels, Belgium – A growing transatlantic debate centers on the future of artificial intelligence and the economic implications for Europe, as a top US official publicly urged the European Union to join the Pax Silica alliance. Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs Jacob Helberg, during a tour of European capitals including Brussels, Paris, London, and The Hague, cautioned that current EU regulations risk hindering its ability to compete in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

The Pax Silica initiative, launched by the United States in December, aims to coordinate a network of allied nations across the entire AI supply chain – from semiconductors and critical minerals to energy and hardware. Washington views this as a strategic platform to address global competition, particularly with China, and to foster economic opportunities for participating countries. The initiative has already seen participation from India, and individual sign-ups from Sweden and Greece, but broader EU engagement remains a key focus for the US administration.

“Pax Silica is knitting together the trusted network the AI race requires. Europe belongs in that network. The question is whether Brussels will let it show up,” Helberg posted on X, underscoring the urgency of the situation. His comments came after EU representatives failed to authorize the European Commission to begin formal talks with the US State Department regarding accession to the alliance. The core of the disagreement, according to Helberg, isn’t a formal requirement for the EU to alter its AI Act, but rather serious concerns about the Act’s potential impact on innovation and market access.

Helberg clarified that there are no formal conditions for entry into Pax Silica, but expressed apprehension that the EU’s regulatory framework, specifically the AI Act, could inadvertently shield the European market from foreign companies, thereby slowing down domestic development. This, he argued, risks leaving Europe “permanently behind” in a technological shift comparable to the industrial revolution. The US administration believes the AI Act, while intended to protect citizens, may have the unintended consequence of stifling competition and hindering growth.

The Netherlands, home to ASML – a critical player in the semiconductor industry and essential to American chip supplies – participated in the Pax Silica ceremony but has not yet formally signed the accession agreement. This highlights the nuanced position of some EU member states, balancing strategic alignment with the US against concerns about regulatory sovereignty. The participation of the Netherlands underscores the importance of the semiconductor supply chain to the Pax Silica initiative, and the US’s desire for broad European involvement.

Beyond the AI Act, Helberg also raised concerns about the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), describing the fines levied on American companies as “onerous and punitive.” He suggested that these penalties are consuming an increasing amount of political capital in transatlantic relations, diverting attention from areas of potential cooperation such as supply chain security and industrial agreements. “The DMA is consuming a quota ever-increasing of the bilateral relationship,” Helberg stated, implying that easing this tension could unlock faster progress on other fronts.

The US official painted a stark picture of the European economy, describing it as facing a “civilizational emergency.” Echoing recent comments from US Vice President JD Vance, Helberg suggested Europe has already missed the initial wave of the digital revolution in the 2010s – the era of platforms, cloud computing, and new business models – and now risks falling further behind in the current AI-driven phase. He warned that the gap is widening and could take a generation to close.

This assessment extends beyond purely economic concerns, encompassing cultural and political factors. Helberg criticized what he characterized as a growing acceptance of stagnation and low growth rates within Europe, describing it as a “soft defeatism” that lowers expectations and discourages risk-taking. He argued that excessive regulation contributes to this environment, making it more difficult to attract investment and foster innovation. According to Helberg, the consequences of these policies are not limited to the companies directly affected; they ultimately impact European citizens through reduced investment and slower economic growth.

Despite the critical tone, Helberg emphasized the US desire for a “strong Europe” and reaffirmed the importance of transatlantic cooperation. He cited ongoing negotiations on trade, critical raw materials, and technology as “constructive,” and highlighted the opportunities presented by industrial collaboration along global supply chains. The US, he stressed, wants to “do it right, not rush,” mirroring the approach taken with India, where an agreement explicitly focused on promoting innovation has been established.

The Pax Silica initiative, serves as both a proposal for strategic integration and a test of Europe’s willingness to adapt its regulatory model. For Washington, the key is not necessarily requiring Europe to change its rules to join, but rather recognizing that a broader rethinking of its regulatory approach is crucial to fully capitalize on the opportunities presented by the AI revolution and avoid being left behind in the global economy. The coming weeks and months will be critical as the EU weighs its options and determines its path forward in this rapidly evolving technological landscape.

The European Commission is currently awaiting a mandate from member governments to begin formal negotiations with the US. The US has indicated it will not accelerate the process without first addressing existing divergences. This suggests a period of continued dialogue and negotiation lies ahead, with the future of transatlantic cooperation on AI hanging in the balance.

The next key checkpoint will be the outcome of discussions within the European Commission and the subsequent decision on whether to seek a negotiating mandate from member states. This is expected to be a key topic of discussion at upcoming EU summits. Stay tuned to Archysport for continuing coverage of this developing story and its implications for the global AI landscape.

What are your thoughts on the Pax Silica alliance and the future of AI regulation? Share your comments below.

Editor-in-Chief

Editor-in-Chief

Daniel Richardson is the Editor-in-Chief of Archysport, where he leads the editorial team and oversees all published content across nine sport verticals. With over 15 years in sports journalism, Daniel has reported from the FIFA World Cup, the Olympic Games, NFL Super Bowls, NBA Finals, and Grand Slam tennis tournaments. He previously served as Senior Sports Editor at Reuters and holds a Master's degree in Journalism from Columbia University. Recognized by the Sports Journalists' Association for excellence in reporting, Daniel is a member of the International Sports Press Association (AIPS). His editorial philosophy centers on accuracy, depth, and fair coverage — ensuring every story published on Archysport meets the highest standards of sports journalism.

Football Basketball NFL Tennis Baseball Golf Badminton Judo Sport News

Leave a Comment