Napoli President Aurelio De Laurentiis Proposes Radical Overhaul of Football Rules to Attract Youth
Aurelio De Laurentiis is not a typical football executive. As a cinematic producer by trade, the Napoli president views the world through a lens of spectacle, pacing, and audience engagement. Now, he is applying that producer’s instinct to the pitch, proposing a set of new football rules designed to strip away the stagnation of the modern game and replace it with high-intensity action.
De Laurentiis has expressed deep concern that the traditional format of football is losing its grip on younger generations. In his view, the lack of dynamics in the current 90-minute struggle is alienating a demographic that craves speed and immediate gratification. To combat this, he is calling for a fundamental restructuring of how matches are played and officiated.
The “Fast-Forward” Format: 25-Minute Halves
The most jarring element of De Laurentiis’ proposal is the suggested reduction of match time. He argues that the standard 45-minute half is too long for the level of intensity required to keep a modern audience engaged. Instead, he suggests shortening halves to just 25 minutes.

The logic is simple: shorter durations allow players to maintain a higher intensity for the entirety of the match. By removing the “lull” periods where teams conserve energy, De Laurentiis believes the game would develop into faster, more aggressive, and significantly more spectacular for the viewer. This shift would effectively transform football from a marathon of endurance into a sprint of high-pressure attacking play.
A War on Simulation and a New Discipline System
Beyond the clock, the Napoli owner wants to change the moral and disciplinary fabric of the game. De Laurentiis has called for the total eradication of simulation. Under his proposed rules, any player caught diving or attempting to deceive the referee would be ordered to leave the field immediately.

He also wants to scrap the traditional yellow and red card system entirely. In its place, he proposes a “sin-bin” model similar to those used in rugby or ice hockey. Instead of a permanent sending-off or a cautionary yellow, players would face temporary disqualifications lasting five or 20 minutes.
This approach aims to punish misconduct without necessarily ruining the competitive balance of the match for the remainder of the game, although still providing a tactical advantage to the opposing side during the penalty period.
The Producer’s Perspective: Why This Matters
To understand these proposals, one must understand the man behind them. Aurelio De Laurentiis is the owner of the film company Filmauro. His career has been built on storytelling and capturing the attention of an audience—skills he now applies to the management of one of Italy’s most passionate clubs.
For De Laurentiis, football is not just a sport; it is a product that must evolve to survive. He believes the game needs more goals and a relentless focus on attacking play to remain relevant. By shortening the game and punishing “dark arts” like simulation, he hopes to pivot the sport toward a more honest, high-scoring spectacle.
From Bankruptcy to the Big Stage: The De Laurentiis Legacy
This willingness to gamble on unconventional ideas is a hallmark of De Laurentiis’ tenure at Napoli. His journey with the club began in 2004 during a period of absolute crisis. While filming a movie in Los Angeles, De Laurentiis took a summer break to Capri, where he read a newspaper report that someone was buying Napoli for €5 million.
At the time, the club had effectively ceased to exist due to bankruptcy. Despite warnings from his wife, Jacqueline, and his son, Luigi—who reminded him that he knew nothing about football—De Laurentiis saw the acquisition as a “thrilling adventure.” He bought the club at auction, though he describes the purchase as essentially buying a “scrap of paper,” as there were no players and no infrastructure remaining.
The road back was grueling. The federation informed him that Napoli would not return to the top flight immediately but would instead have to start from the bottom in Serie C. It was a long journey through southern Italy, but the businessman’s persistence eventually restored the club to its former glory in Serie A.
Analysis: Could the “Napoli Model” Work?
While the proposals are radical, they address a genuine anxiety within the sport: the attention span of Gen Z and Gen Alpha. The “sin-bin” approach would certainly add a layer of tactical volatility, forcing coaches to adjust their formations in short, 5-to-20-minute windows.
However, the reduction to 25-minute halves would require a total rethink of player conditioning and tactical setups. The current game relies heavily on periodization and energy management; a “sprint” format would likely favor explosive athletes over traditional playmakers.
The proposal to immediately eject players for simulation would likely be the most welcomed change by fans, though it would place an immense burden of accuracy on referees and VAR officials, as a single wrong call could fundamentally alter the match’s outcome.
Key Takeaways of the Proposed Changes
- Match Duration: Halves reduced from 45 minutes to 25 minutes to increase intensity.
- Discipline: Elimination of yellow and red cards in favor of temporary 5 or 20-minute disqualifications.
- Integrity: Immediate ejection for any player caught simulating.
- Goal: Increase the number of goals and attract younger viewers by making the game more dynamic.
De Laurentiis has indicated that he remains open to dialogue with the football federation to discuss these changes. While it is unlikely that the global governing bodies will overhaul the laws of the game overnight, the Napoli president’s proposals serve as a provocative critique of the sport’s current trajectory.
For more updates on the evolving rules of the game and the latest from Serie A, stay tuned to Archysport. We will continue to monitor any official responses from the federation regarding these proposals.
What do you think of these changes? Would 25-minute halves make football more exciting, or would it ruin the essence of the sport? Let us know in the comments.