The ongoing debate surrounding the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) in professional soccer took a dramatic turn this past weekend, as a fan at a 2. Bundesliga match between Preußen Münster and Hertha BSC took matters into their own hands. During a contested penalty area decision, the referee was faced with a black screen instead of the usual VAR replay, after a supporter reportedly cut the power supply to the video equipment. The incident, accompanied by a banner reading “Dem VAR den Stecker ziehen” (Pull the plug on VAR), has reignited the discussion about the role and impact of video review in the beautiful game.
For years, fans across Germany – and globally – have voiced their frustrations with VAR. Introduced in 2017, the system was intended to increase fairness and transparency in officiating. Though, as the source material notes, the implementation has been far from seamless. Annual adjustments have failed to address core concerns, leading to a situation where celebrating a goal is often delayed, replaced by anxious glances at the referee awaiting a signal from the VAR officials. This hesitation, many argue, diminishes the spontaneous joy that is central to the soccer experience.
The protest in Münster wasn’t an isolated incident. As highlighted in web search results, fan actions have become increasingly creative in recent years, ranging from tennis balls thrown onto the pitch – a tactic used to protest against proposed investor deals in the Bundesliga – to remotely controlled cars and pointed messages displayed on banners. These actions, while sometimes disruptive, have consistently brought fan concerns to the forefront. The source material emphasizes that these protests *have* been noticed, and have, at times, influenced decisions.
The specific frustration with VAR stems from the perceived disruption of the game’s flow and the subjective nature of some reviews. The initial promise of VAR – to correct clear and obvious errors – has often been overshadowed by lengthy delays and debatable decisions. The source material points out that while VAR is a fixture in the top two German leagues, It’s absent in the third and lower divisions, a fact noted with satisfaction by a fan whose favorite team plays in the fourth tier.
The incident in Münster raises questions about the potential consequences for the fan involved. While the act was non-violent, interfering with match officials and equipment could lead to sanctions. However, some, including the author of the original piece (referred to as “Fananwalt” or “The Fan Lawyer”), argue that the fan should be rewarded with free admission to games until VAR is abolished. This sentiment reflects the depth of feeling surrounding the issue.
This protest isn’t happening in a vacuum. In February 2024, fans of Hertha BSC and Hamburger SV disrupted a match by throwing tennis balls onto the field, another demonstration against perceived injustices in the game. Süddeutsche Zeitung reported on this action, highlighting the growing frustration among supporters. Similarly, in November 2025, as reported by 11 Freunde, tennis balls made a reappearance in stadiums, signaling a renewed wave of protest.
The broader context of these protests is the increasing commercialization of soccer and the perceived disconnect between the sport’s governing bodies and its fans. The failed attempts to secure an investor deal for the Bundesliga, as detailed in a report from Die Rheinpfalz, demonstrate the power of fan activism. The employ of tennis balls, and now direct intervention with VAR equipment, are tactics employed to make their voices heard.
The effectiveness of these protests remains a subject of debate. While the investor deal ultimately failed, it’s difficult to attribute that solely to fan actions. However, the widespread media coverage and public discussion generated by these protests undoubtedly put pressure on the DFL (German Football League) and its stakeholders. The disruption in Münster, in particular, served as a stark reminder of the passion and commitment of soccer fans.
The incident also raises questions about security measures at stadiums. How was a fan able to access the VAR equipment and cut the power supply? Stadium operators will likely review their security protocols to prevent similar incidents in the future. However, it’s also worth considering whether overly restrictive security measures could further alienate fans and stifle legitimate forms of protest.
The debate over VAR is unlikely to subside anytime soon. The system continues to be refined, but fundamental concerns about its impact on the game remain. The protest in Münster, and the broader wave of fan activism, demonstrate that supporters are not willing to stand by and watch as they feel the soul of the game is eroded. The question now is whether the DFL and other governing bodies will listen and address these concerns before further action is taken.
Looking ahead, Hertha BSC will face Kaiserslautern on March 19th. It remains to be seen whether further protests are planned for that match, or for other Bundesliga and 2. Bundesliga fixtures. The DFL is expected to discuss the incident in Münster at its next meeting, but no immediate changes to the VAR system are anticipated. Fans, however, are likely to continue making their voices heard, both on and off the pitch.
What are your thoughts on the use of VAR in soccer? Share your opinions in the comments below.
Keep reading
