The saga continues. Just hours after former U.S. President Donald Trump cast doubt on Iran’s participation in the 2026 FIFA World Cup, scheduled for June 11 to July 19 in the United States, Canada and Mexico, the Iranian national team issued a response via Instagram late Thursday.
“The World Cup is a historic and international event whose governing body is FIFA, not an individual or a country,” Team Melli wrote in a statement accompanying the post, referencing FIFA President Gianni Infantino. The statement underscores the established governance structure of the tournament, pushing back against what is perceived as undue political influence.
“Thanks to its strength and a series of decisive victories achieved by the brave sons of Iran, the Iranian national team was among the first to qualify for this major tournament,” the team added, referencing their qualification secured on March 25, 2025. This qualification, achieved under challenging circumstances, is a point of national pride for Iran.
“It is certain that no one can exclude the Iranian national team from the World Cup; the only country that could be excluded is the one that simply carries the title of ‘host’ but does not have the capacity to ensure the safety of the teams participating in this global event,” the Iranian team stated, directly addressing Donald Trump. This pointed response highlights concerns about security and political interference in the tournament.
“Not Appropriate” for Iran to Participate, According to Trump
The exchange follows a series of statements from Trump questioning Iran’s participation, fueled by ongoing geopolitical tensions. On Thursday, Trump stated he believed it would be “not appropriate” for Iran to compete in the World Cup “for their own safety,” according to reports. This position represents a shift from earlier statements, as reported by Fox News, where FIFA President Gianni Infantino indicated Trump had “reiterated” Iran’s welcome to compete. The conflicting messages underscore the complex political backdrop surrounding the tournament.
The situation escalated further after Iranian Sports Minister Ahmad Doyanmali indicated on Wednesday that a team would not be sent to the World Cup, citing concerns over U.S. Actions. “Given that this corrupt regime [the United States] has assassinated our leader, we cannot in any way participate in the World Cup,” Doyanmali told Reuters. This statement reflects the deep-seated animosity and distrust between the two nations.
The potential absence of Iran from the 2026 World Cup raises significant questions about the intersection of politics and sport. The tournament, intended to be a celebration of global unity, is increasingly caught in the crosshairs of international conflict. The situation is particularly sensitive given the United States is a co-host nation, adding another layer of complexity to the issue.
Infantino’s recent meeting with Trump, as detailed in an Instagram post on Tuesday, aimed to address preparations for the World Cup and the ongoing situation in Iran. Infantino shared that Trump had reaffirmed Iran’s welcome to compete, but Trump’s subsequent public statements have created confusion and uncertainty. The FIFA President emphasized the need for the World Cup to “bring people together now more than ever,” highlighting the potential for the tournament to serve as a unifying force despite geopolitical challenges.
But, the Iranian sports minister’s stance suggests a growing reluctance to participate, even if invited. Doyanmali’s comments reflect a sense of grievance and a belief that the U.S. Cannot guarantee the safety of Iranian athletes. This position is rooted in a history of strained relations and perceived threats from the United States.
The unfolding situation presents a significant challenge for FIFA, which is tasked with ensuring the smooth and inclusive running of the World Cup. Balancing political sensitivities with the principles of fair play and international cooperation will be crucial in navigating this delicate situation. The organization must also consider the potential ramifications of excluding a qualified team, which could set a dangerous precedent for future tournaments.
The 2026 World Cup is already notable as the first to be co-hosted by three nations – the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The expanded format, featuring 48 teams for the first time, aims to broaden the tournament’s global reach and inclusivity. However, the current controversy surrounding Iran’s participation threatens to overshadow these positive developments.
As of Friday, March 13, 2026, no final decision has been made regarding Iran’s participation. The Iranian team’s strong statement on Instagram signals their determination to compete, but the ultimate outcome will likely depend on a complex interplay of political factors and security considerations. The situation remains fluid and is subject to change as the tournament draws closer.
The next key development will likely be a formal response from FIFA, outlining its position on the matter and any potential measures to address the concerns raised by both Iran and the United States. Fans and stakeholders will be closely watching for updates as the situation evolves.
What are your thoughts on this developing story? Share your opinions in the comments below.
