Como’s remarkable season in Serie A continued on Saturday with a 2-1 victory over Roma, a result that not only propelled them into the Champions League places but also highlighted the tactical acumen of manager Cesc Fàbregas. The win, secured at the Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia, showcased a strategic shift that effectively countered the man-marking approach favored by Roma’s Gian Piero Gasperini, and has sparked discussion about the evolving tactical landscape of Italian football.
Gasperini, known for his proactive and intensely organized teams, had previously found success against Como in December, employing a high press to force long balls and disrupt their build-up play. That earlier victory, when Roma was fourth and Como sixth, seemed to establish a blueprint for neutralizing Fàbregas’ side. However, Saturday’s match demonstrated that the former Arsenal and Barcelona midfielder had learned from that encounter, implementing a plan that completely unsettled the Roma coach.
A Tactical Shift: Disrupting Roma’s Man-Marking System
The core of Como’s success lay in their ability to dismantle Roma’s man-marking scheme. Fàbregas opted for a starting lineup without a traditional center forward, creating a fluid and unpredictable attacking structure. In a theoretical 5-2-3 formation, players like Baturina, Nico Paz, and Caqueret lacked defined roles as a focal point, instead interchanging positions and drawing defenders out of position. Remarkably, the most advanced players were often defenders Jacobo Ramon and Smolcic, making deep runs to challenge Roma’s defensive line.
This unconventional approach effectively inverted the expected formation, with the midfield trio of Baturina, Paz, and Caqueret constantly rotating, and attacks culminating in passes into the space for Ramon and Smolcic. Jacobo Ramon nearly opened the scoring in the first half with a well-struck volley, showcasing the effectiveness of this movement. The fluidity of Como’s attack forced Roma’s defenders to constantly reassess their assignments, creating confusion and openings.
The constant positional changes disrupted Roma’s man-marking assignments. El Shaarawy and Wesley, tasked with tracking the runs of Ramon and Smolcic, struggled to maintain their assignments, often leaving them in the responsibility of Cristante or a central defender. The complexity of tracking these movements was compounded by Como’s ability to overload the defensive line with runs from Baturina, Caqueret, Paz, and Da Cunha, forcing Roma’s players to constantly step forward and engage.
Despite Roma taking the lead through a Donyell Malen penalty, Como controlled possession and tempo for much of the first half. The penalty stemmed from an El Shaarawy steal, but it was an isolated incident in an otherwise dominant performance by the home side.
Second-Half Adjustments and a Turning Point
The introduction of Anastasious Douvikas and Assane Diao at the start of the second half proved pivotal. Fàbregas shifted from a fluid, positional-play approach to a more direct strategy, deploying two players specifically tasked with attacking the depth of Roma’s defense. This tactical change immediately put pressure on Roma’s backline, creating more space for Como’s midfielders to operate.
The increased threat posed by Douvikas and Diao forced Roma’s defense to drop deeper, opening up passing lanes and providing more room for Como’s creative players. This shift also elevated the performance of Nico Paz, who thrived in the increased space. The equalizer, a result of this new strategy, highlighted the impact of Fàbregas’ adjustments. A well-placed through ball found Douvikas, who capitalized on a hesitant reaction from Roma’s defense to score.
The goal, which Gasperini would later attribute to a defensive error, was a direct consequence of Como’s ability to exploit the space created by the tactical shift. The match took another turn with the sending off of Roma’s Wesley, a controversial decision that further tilted the balance in Como’s favor.
Superiority and a Decisive Goal
With a man advantage, Como completely dominated the remainder of the match. Their ability to manipulate Roma’s marking scheme became even more pronounced, and they created numerous scoring opportunities. Diego Carlos ultimately secured the victory with a goal from a corner, capping off a well-deserved win.
The match was a high-tempo, European-style affair, befitting the stakes. It was a testament to the tactical battle between two highly respected managers, with Fàbregas ultimately emerging victorious. Como’s win wasn’t just about securing three points. it was a demonstration of their potential to disrupt the established order in Serie A. They now sit fourth in the league standings, three points ahead of Roma.
Fàbregas’ influence on Como is undeniable. He has transformed the club into a team capable of challenging the traditional powers of Italian football. The victory over Roma is a clear indication of their ambition and tactical sophistication.
Roma will next face Udinese on March 22nd at the Dacia Arena. Como will travel to play against Lazio on March 21st at the Stadio Olimpico.
What are your thoughts on Como’s impressive season? Share your opinions in the comments below!
