Years after the acute phase of the Covid 19 pandemic, what emerges more clearly is not only the complexity of the health event, but the systemic failure of its political, communicative and regulatory management. As long as it was a failure, an inability. Wrong protocols have been imposed: Tachipirina, watchful waiting, no vitamin D and no vitamin C, antibiotics only when it is too late, due to pure inability or a monstrous plan, to create the emergency necessary to throw drugs onto the market with ridiculous testing times, two months.
The wrong protocols were protected by the doctors’ orders, who did not spare themselves in biting in the face the colleagues who gave the correct treatments and who even dared to report them, but also from social media, by precise order of the Biden administration, censorship came. Every time I gave the correct protocol my page was blocked. The protocol was so wrong that it was prudently anonymous: we continue to ignore its author, who is evidently too ashamed to declare himself. We remember the disgusted face with which Pierpaolo Silerifirst deputy minister and then undersecretary of health, on television shut the mouths of the doctors who treated and healed.
Ora Sileriwho is also a doctor, candidly declares that he does not know who the author of the wrong protocol is, which was therefore imposed without anyone, not even a deputy minister with a medical degree, bothering to ask: «Excuse me, who wrote this stuff? Was it written by someone sitting at a desk while consulting scientific literature, or was it written in a notebook while waiting for the train, or during a coffee break? Does the author at least have a degree in medicine? A “failure” that has been actively covered by a dogmatic narrative, impervious to scientific dissent, impenetrable to common sense and logic: inflammatory diseases are treated with anti-inflammatories; coagulative diseases are treated with anticoagulants, etc., treatments for coronaviruses were developed in 2013 and include aspirin, hydroxychloroquine, etc.
The dogmatic narrative was supported by information aligned with power as never before, with the only exceptions being the newspaper The Truth and transmission Out of the Choir Of Mario Giordano. In this context, the declarations of Robert R. Redfieldformer director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), take on the value of a real accusation from within the healthcare system. “I think mRNA vaccines cause more harm than people think,” he said Redfield. Not a fringe commentator, not an ideological activist, but the top US public health official during a crucial part of the pandemic.
Even more serious is his denunciation of the systematic disinformation operated by the institutions: the representation of the crisis as a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”, according to Redfieldwas not only scientifically incorrect, but deliberately misleading. “The vaccine does not prevent infection,” he declared, retroactively dismantling the rhetorical pillar on which policies of exclusion, discrimination and obligation were built. The first to apply them were the presidents of the medical associations. Either they were unable to understand that the technical data sheets did not declare the drugs capable of blocking the disease, or they understood it and followed orders. Both hypotheses are disturbing, to use the mildest of all possible synonyms. The vaccine does not prevent infection.
Please reread this sentence two or three times and then think about the statements of Mario Draghi“those who do not vaccinate die and cause death”, by Sergio Mattarella on the freedom that the unvaccinated have no right to invoke. Listen again to the long series of insults and curses against those who resisted and refused a drug that did not help to stop the epidemic and which had unknown side effects. He reads these insults and curses in his show Slaves, Max Del Papaa journalist and a man damaged by the vaccine, who raises his voice in defense of all those who have been trampled upon, who have developed devastating, if not downright deadly, side effects following the inoculation of a drug that did not prevent transmission and did not save anyone from contagion.
The admission of Redfield makes the measures adopted in many Western countries, including Italy, politically and morally unsustainable. If a product does not prevent infection or interrupt transmission, there is no scientific justification for imposing it as a requirement for working, studying or participating in social life. Vaccination requirements and certification systems no longer appear as public health tools, but as acts of coercion based on assumptions that were not just deliberately simplified, they were simply false. It is particularly serious that the Constitutional Court deemed the entire pandemic narrative sensible and therefore not contrary to the Constitution, with the most basic freedoms trampled upon, including the freedom not to get sick and not die as a side effect of a mandatory drug.
The responsibility does not fall only on political decision-makers. A significant part of the medical-scientific community and mainstream information has acted as an uncritical sounding board, delegitimizing any dissenting voice and transforming the scientific debate into a moral issue. Anyone who raised doubts about efficacy, safety, proportionality and even administration to pregnant women and children was labeled dangerous, ignorant or an enemy of science. Today, many of the statements censored at the time coincide with what was declared by a former director of the CDC.
Particularly serious is the question of the medium and long-term effects of mRNA vaccines, which Redfield himself recognizes as still unknown. Despite this, vaccination has been extended to very low-risk population groups, in the absence of an individualized risk-benefit assessment. Despite all this, vaccination is continuing, no longer forced, of course, but supported by statements that minimize its side effects.
At this moment in Italy there are people who are continuing to be injected with this drug. This choice was not the result of a mature scientific consensus, but of a political strategy that favored uniformity and obedience over prudence and method. The result is damage that goes beyond the health plan, which is also very serious. The relationship of trust between citizens, medicine and institutions has been compromised; the use of lies “for good” has been normalized; a dangerous precedent has been created in which the emergency justifies any suspension of critical thinking and fundamental rights. The words of Robert R. Redfield today forces a reckoning. It is no longer acceptable to dismiss everything as an inevitable mistake or to ask “not to talk about it again”. Talking about vaccines today means talking about political, scientific and media responsibilities. And silence, at this point, is not prudence: it is complicity. Cardiologists and oncologists tell us that their waiting rooms are packed and that the age of patients has dropped by at least 15 years.
Every day someone is killed by cardiac arrest, charmingly called sudden illness, evidently from vaccine myocarditis. These deaths are always accompanied by a great deal of grief and never followed by autopsies. It continues to be very difficult, if not impossible, to convince your doctor to report adverse effects from the vaccine. Disabled people continue to be without compensation. The battle isn’t over, it’s just beginning.
