If the Timberwolves decided to join the deal between the Pistons and the Bullsit is to be able to gain flexibility on the financial level and thus increase their chances of recovering Giannis Antetokounmpo, by Thursday.
even though, according to ESPN, they could easily have obtained Coby White, whom they have been targeting for several weeks and who could therefore have strengthened them in the lead. A bold bet, when we know their difficulties in the sector since the start of the season.
Where could he bounce back?
Instead, Minnesota preferred to separate from Mike Conley and a future second round of Draft, only getting cash back according to Jake Fischer, and the veteran leader finally landed at Chicago.
Except that Chris Haynes is already reporting that he should never play for the Bulls, because the player and the franchise will make sure to find a new base for him. Ideally via a transfer, but we assume that his market value is at its lowest and that it will instead be necessary to go through an amicable termination of contract.
at the age of 38, Mike Conley probably wants to give himself one last chance at the title, by joining a team at the top of the table.The problem is that his impact has declined enormously, with the worst statistics of his career: 4.4 points, 2.9 assists and 1.8 rebounds over 19 minutes (at 32% at 3-points).
| Mike Conley | Percentage | Rebounds | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saison | Team | MJ | Min | Shots | 3pts | LF | Off | Def | To | Pd | Fte | Int | Bp | Ct | Pts | ||||||
| 2007-08 | MEM | 53 | 26:03 | 42.8 | 33.0 | 73.2 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 9.4 | ||||||
| 2008-09 | MEM | 82 | 30:35 | 44.2 | 40.6 | 81.7 | 0.3 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 10.9 | ||||||
| 2009-10 | MEM | 80 | 32:07 | 44.5 | 38.7 | 74.3 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 12.0 | ||||||
| 2010-11 | MEM | 81 | 35:27 | 44.4 | 36.9 | 73.3 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 3.0 | 6.5 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 13.7 | ||||||
| 2011-12 | MEM | 62 | 35:04 | 43.3 | 37.7 | 86.1 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 12.7 | ||||||
| 2012-13 | MEM | 80 | 34:28 | 44.0 | 36.2 | 83.0 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 6.1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 14.6 | ||||||
| 2013-14 | MEM | 73 | 33:30 | 45.0 | 36.1 | 81.5 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 17.2 | ||||||
| 2014-15 | MEM | 70 | 31:47 | 44.6 | 38.6 | 85.9 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 3.0 | 5.4 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 15.8 | ||||||
| 2015-16 | MEM | 56 | 31:26 | 42.2 | 36.3 | 83.4 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 15.3 | ||||||
| 2016-17 | MEM | 69 | 33:37 | 46.0 | 40.8 | 85.9 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 20.5 | ||||||
| 2017-18 | MEM | 12 | 31:05 | 38.1 | 31.2 | 80.3 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 17.1 | ||||||
| 2018-19 | MEM | 70 | 33:27 | 43.8 | 36.4 | 84.5 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 6.4 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 21.1 | ||||||
| 2019-20 | UTA | 47 | 29:00 | 40.9 | 37.5 | 82.7 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 14.4 | ||||||
| 2020-21 | UTA | 51 | 29:22 | 44.4 | 41.2 | 85.2 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 16.2 | ||||||
| 2021-22 | UTA | 72 | 28:35 | 43.5 | 40.8 | 79.6 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 13.7 | ||||||
| 2022-23 | MIN | 24 | 31:23 | 46.0 | 42.0 | 86.3 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 45.7 | 44.2 | 91.1 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 5.9 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 11.4 |
| 2024-25 | MIN | 71 | 24:44 | 40.0 | 41.0 | 90.0 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 4.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 8.2 | ||||||
| 2025-26 | MIN | 44 | 18:27 | 32.2 | 32.1 | 89.1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 4.4 | ||||||
How to read the stats? MJ = matches played; Min = Minutes; Shots = prosperous shots / Attempted shots; 3pts = 3-points / 3-points attempted; LF = free throws made / free throws attempted; Off = offensive rebound; Def=defensive rebound; Tot = Total rebounds; Pd = assists; Fte: Personal fouls; Int = Intercepts; Bp = Lost balls; Ct: Against; Pts = Points.