Dinorah denies the accusation and defended herself by presenting, in defense, more than 130 pages of conversations and evidence. In several of the conversations, Daniel himself requests the transfer of values. In others, an employee of the company that Dinorah and Daniel maintained together, called Natha, is the one who controls the expenses – Natha now works exclusively for Daniel.
Dinorah also contracted, on her own, an audit of the documents and receipts, and presented the results to the Court. The report points out that there would be proof of destination of R$25.4 million – of which R$10.8 million would refer to payments for her children with Daniel. R$ 4.2 million were expenses with Daniel’s authorization; R$1.4 million would correspond to transfers to Dinorah’s account, with the former player’s express authorization.
According to the report, only R$800,000 would have remained without proven destination. Dinorah also points out that Daniel and Natha had, throughout the contested period, access to accounts and transfers, without ever pointing out any irregularities or disputes.
The Court did not accept the reports as sufficient, and in the decision demanded detailed accounts in commercial format, with complete details of income, expenses and balance.
