Jan Breydel’s grumbling can no longer be ignored. While Christian Benteke arrives on a free transfer, Club Brugge stubbornly insists that it does not need “a pure killer”. For many fans, that feels like a hallucinatory Benteke blunder that you simply shouldn’t make in such a season.
READ ALSO:
Broker Benteke responds to rumors RSCA and Club Brugge
“No need for a pure killer”: this is how the Benteke blunder began
More like: Club Bruges This season it lacks a striker who can convert chances into goals. And just announced last week Christian Benteke announced his departure from DC United, on a free transfer after a season in which he scored almost everything that moves in the MLS. In Bruges, however, it is said that the team “doesn’t need a pure killer.” It was not a slip of the tongue from Dévy Rigaux, but an emphasis on the transfer policy.
The Director of Football explained that Club does not have a scoring problem in most matches, that it is better to let different players score than to put everything on one man. “We are not looking for a pure killer in the striker. Vermant and Tresoldi are top strikers for Club Brugge.” But anyone who watches the matches will notice that Club creates enough chances, but simply doesn’t score enough. Last season, Blauw-Zwart easily exceeded the two goals per match mark, now they are almost one goal per match lower.
This puts us at the heart of the conflict. Rigaux actually says: we don’t need a killer, because the system works and the goals will come. The outside world notes that Club does miss someone who scores opportunities. Franky Van der Elst now repeats it almost every week. He calls Rigaux’s statement “unfortunate”. Marc Degryse also does not spare the words. In his analyzes he has been harping on the same point for months: Club needs a centre-forward who makes war in the box, someone who hurts defenders and takes the shortest route to goal with every cross.
From Benteke dream to reality check in one fell swoop
And exactly at that moment the name Benteke comes to the surface. DC United does not exercise its option, Benteke officially becomes a free player. In the MLS he scored very well in recent seasons, became top scorer and All-Star. The imagination immediately runs wild: Benteke in a full Jan Breydel, scoring from crosses from Tzolis and Vanaken. Finally someone who can convert the many goal chances into goals.
Then comes the disillusionment. Brother Jonathan writes on X a dry “Fake news” among the Belgian rumors. It is coming through from the American side that Benteke feels good in Washington and that discussions about a new contract continue. And in the MLS, Benteke is one of the top earners, with amounts that are almost unattainable in Belgium. Even for a rich club like Club Brugge.
Yet the feeling remains that this story is more than a fantasy. Benteke is the perfect lightning rod for the entire discussion. He embodies everything that Club lacks according to analysts: experience, presence, a nose for goals. And it is, on paper, free. The fact that it is too expensive and perhaps not feasible in practice does not change what it symbolizes: the kind of killer that Rigaux tells the public he does not need.
Nilsson out, no replacement: why fans are furious
The supporters see a Belgian finisher on the market, hear their icons calling for a finisher, and get a sporting director who explains that the scoring problem is actually not too bad. On top of that comes the Nilsson file. The Swedish target man may leave in January and in the same breath it is said that there will be no need for a replacement striker. The message is clear: Club consciously opts for a core without the classic number nine. It’s Vermant, Tresoldi or no one.
You can follow this from a policy logic perspective: young strikers with residual value, a wage bill that must remain under control, and the belief that the system is more important than one name. But try explaining that to fans who are longing for a goalgetter in the team.
