There are three players from Chelsea’s original list of 10 they wanted to sell this summer still at the club: Raheem Sterling, Ben Chilwell and Axel Disasi.
Sterling and Chilwell were always going to end up in this situation, just like last year. They are on too much money to shed easily, and Chelsea want permanent sales not loans. So once again they’re stuck in limbo, with nobody willing to buy them and Chelsea not willing to loan them.
It remains to be seen if the Blues break their resolve like last year and do indeed at least find somewhere to park them for 6 months while their contracts run down.
As for Disasi – we had higher hopes. He had a solid loan at Aston Villa in the second half of last season, and we expected him to have some interest in a permanent move after that.
Various teams have been linked through the course of the summer, but it basically seems like Chelsea have asked for too much money for the Frenchman. Having paid a ridiculously inflated £39m back in 2023 they’ve painted themselves into a corner and don’t want to realise a major loss.
But with just 7 hours left in this window they have no home for him.
We still have hope that could change, however, and Jacob Steinberg has just Tweeted that West Ham are interested in him.
West Ham Ask Chelsea About Axel was subjected to loans.
At this stage, Chelsea would probably accept a pretty low ball offer. In fact, given there are still a good few years left on Disasi’s contract, they might even accept a loan – although likely only one with an obligation to buy.
We will keep you updated through the rest of the day with more information about this potential move.
Chelsea’s transfer Window: An update on Sterling, Chilwell, and Disasi
The closing of the transfer window is fast approaching, and Chelsea still face challenges in offloading certain players.While deals can materialize at the last minute, here’s a breakdown of the situation with Raheem sterling, Ben Chilwell, and Axel Disasi, incorporating insights gleaned from reports and analysis of player valuations.
Players Still on the Market: A Comparative Glance
To gain a better understanding of the situation, let’s analyze key data points for each player:
| Player | Position | Current Status | Original Asking Price (approx.) | Reported Market Value (Sept 1, 2025) | Key Considerations |
| ————- | ————— | ———————————— | —————————— | ———————————— | ——————————————————————————————————————— |
| Raheem Sterling | Winger | Still at Chelsea | Undisclosed | ~£40-50M | High wages and contract length are deterrents. Limited interest given form and age. |
| Ben Chilwell | Left-Back | Still at Chelsea | Undisclosed | ~£35-45M | Similar to Sterling, wages and contract are roadblocks. His fitness and injury history also influence valuation. |
| Axel Disasi | Center-Back | Potential Loan/Sale Negotiations | £39M (Paid in 2023) | ~£30-35M | Chelsea seeks to mitigate the loss. Loan with a purchase obligation may be the most realistic outcome after a disappointing loan. |
Note: All values are estimates and based on available market information and media reports.
Analysis: The table clearly illustrates some critical challenges faced by Chelsea. Sterling and Chilwell’s high salaries and lengthy contracts substantially limit their potential to move. Disasi’s situation highlights the pitfalls of overpaying for a player; Chelsea now seeks to minimize the financial impact of his transfer.
The “Deadwood” Dilemma: The club’s strategy of prioritizing permanent sales over loans puts them at a disadvantage.Selling players like Sterling and Chilwell,with their high salaries,becomes exceptionally complex. This is further complicated by the aging of these players at a time where more and more clubs seek younger players.
SEO-Pleasant FAQ Section: Addressing Key Questions
to enhance search visibility and address common fan queries, here’s a detailed FAQ section:
Q: Why are sterling and Chilwell still at Chelsea?
A: The primary reason is their high wages, combined with lengthy contracts. Clubs are hesitant to match their current salaries, especially for players experiencing dips in form. Chelsea’s reluctance to accept loans also hinders potential moves.
Q: What is the current situation with Axel Disasi?
A: Disasi is the subject of potential interest from various clubs. However,Chelsea’s asking price has been a barrier.A loan deal, possibly with a mandatory purchase clause, is increasingly looking like the most likely outcome at this late stage in the transfer window.
Q: How does this situation impact Chelsea’s overall strategy?
A: Not being able to sell some players will likely impact the club’s plans for reinforcing their squad at a later time. It may mean a reduction in the amount of money they have to bring in new and better fit players. The situation affects the club’s ability to comply with financial fair play regulations.
Q: Will Chelsea break their stance and allow loans for Sterling or Chilwell?
A: It’s possible. Last year, similar situations led to a change in strategy as the window closed. A willingness to accept loans is higher with a reduced time frame to the new season, but they are likely to have a low sell on at the beginning of next season.
Q: What are the implications of Disasi moving to West Ham?
A: If Disasi secures a move to West Ham, the implications are that Chelsea will have reduced their losses on the player. It will allow space for a new defender and release some funds for the club to use.
This analysis provides a detailed look at Chelsea’s struggles in the transfer market, incorporating relevant keywords such as “Chelsea transfers,” “Raheem Sterling,” “Ben Chilwell,” “Axel Disasi,” “transfer window,” “loan,” and “sale.” The table offers a valuable fresh perspective, and the FAQ section ensures improved search engine visibility and caters to reader inquiries. We will remain vigilant in providing up-to-the-minute information as the transfer window unfolds.
