It ran the 90+1 minute of the match between Millionaires and Sports Pastovalid for the second date of Closing Tournamentwhich postponed the day that was initially scheduled for logistics problems at the El Campín de Bogotá stadium. The Bogota cast, now led by Hernán Torres won 1-0.
His audience’s support helped him go up on the scoreboard. The goal was scored by the Argentine Santiago Giordana, when they went 30 minutes of the first half. That celebration filled the blue fans with joy, who during this semester have expressed, even pulling shoes from the tribune to the court, their discontent with the poor performance of the team.
What was the play that generated controversy in the Duel Millionaires vs Pasto?
To the footballer Jhon Caicedo, Captain of the Pasto, They sent a ball to the area. He went to look for him, but he did not reach him because Novoa left his goal to damn the ball, send it away. However, in that process, when he was in the air, the player of the Nariñense team was taken ahead: He hit his right foot on his chest.
The central judge did not see the play. Your VAR attendees, Juan Pablo Alba and Hermízul Calderon, omitted the action, did not call it to check the video and could whistle penalty in favor of the grass. This was denounced by the team on his social networks: “Mr. Bismarks Santiago omitted at least one VAR review about this action against our player Johan Caicedo,” they wrote in a trill, accompanied by the video of the action.
Then, they published a photo of how the affected soccer player’s shirt was: with a hole in the chest, just where the main advertising of the pastus cast is. This trino accompanied him with an application: “We expect the relevant professional corrections by the arbitration commission that determine a better arbitration horizon for all clubs in our Colombian football.”
The action, as expected, generated controversy. Pasto soccer players claimed, but the central judge did not yield. On the contrary, he ended up expelling Nicolás Gil, from Pasto. The arbitration analyst José Borda expressed, in his X account, that the play of Novoa “was a criminal and red. In Millionaires vs Pasto the referee Santiago and the VAR did not give as a penalty this violent lack of Novoa to Caicedo del Pasto, in addition to the prison was red for the goalkeeper. This action had already sanctioned the goalkeeper Asprilla de Santa Fe”.
