:focal(1396x391:1398x389)/origin-imgresizer.eurosport.com/2025/08/16/image-316acf68-5e40-4b5d-87c5-04e9b239c8f3-85-2560-1440.jpeg)
L’Italiawhich has 15 points from Simone to happen14 the Mattia Ruggeri and 12 with 11 rebounds of a solid Alessandro Albaonce again pays the bad racing percentages, with 15 out of 27 to the free and a disastrous 4 out of 22 from threewhile a rebound domain is not enough, 44 to 32 and even 17 to 5 in offensive ones. There Sloveniawhich instead slips 12 triples (44%), you can enjoy the 16 points of Rezec, the 14 of Rupnik, especially the 27 points with 9 out of 11 at the shot, 5 rebounds and 6 assists of a overflowing overflow Lun Jarc.
As with Lithuania, theItalia It is almost always forced to chase: below 26-22 at the first break, then in the second period he puts his nose forward 33-31, but then collects two triples and ends at -9, before 44-37 of the interval. In the second half the music does not change, the unleashed Yoke fa +11 Slovenia on 53-42But the Blue they do not give up and as in the semifinal they return close: the inventions of Ventura and the baskets of Alba are worth the -3 on 68-65 3 ‘from the end. There Slovenia replies for the rhymes, Pregl He puts the bomb of the new +6 and from there he gets into the conquest with merit of the bronze, with 79-71 finale.
L’Italiawhich as mentioned has already conquered a place for the World Under 17 next year, he cannot repeat the bronze in Under 16 as in 2019 in Udine: the best result in this category remains theoro of the 1991 won in Greece with the team that had among its files Andrea Meneghin.
The scoreboard
Slovenia: Godec, Rupnik 14, Slapnik 1, Trsan 6, Hegic, Ogorevc No, Anderlic, Pregl 9, Rezec 16, Jarc 27, Ilic 2, Roznik 4. All. Gornjec.
Italia: Nicolodi 6, Milazzo 2, Chouenkam 1, Ruggeri 14, Ventura 15, Papal ne, Compaore 2, Ronci 5, Alba 12, Sguazzin 6, Machetti 8. All. Mangone.
Pozzecco: “Cash? I understand the disappointment of the fans, we are sorry”
Video credit: Eurosport
Key Match Statistics: Italy vs.Slovenia (Under 17 Bronze Medal Game)
To provide a clearer picture of the game’s narrative, let’s delve into a comparative analysis of key statistics. This table highlights the key differences in performance that ultimately led to Slovenia’s victory.
Table 1: Italy vs. Slovenia – Statistical Breakdown
| Statistic | Italy | Slovenia | Difference | Notes |
| :———————— | :—————- | :—————- | :—————– | :—————————————————————————————————————————- |
| Field Goal % | 37% (19/51) | 54% (29/54) | -17% | Slovenia’s superior shooting accuracy was a critical factor. |
| 3-Point % | 18% (4/22) | 44% (12/27) | -26% | italy’s struggles from beyond the arc substantially hampered their offensive output. |
| Free Throw % | 56% (15/27) | 83% (9/11) | -27% | Italy lost precious points from the free-throw line,a major detriment in a close contest. |
| Rebounds | 44 | 32 | +12 | Italy dominated the boards, but it wasn’t enough to overcome their shooting woes. |
| Offensive Rebounds | 17 | 5 | +12 | Italy capitalized on their offensive rebounds,but failed to convert enough in second-chance points. |
| Turnovers | (Not Available) | (Not Available) | | Further analysis would benefit from turnover data. |
| Leading Scorer | Ventura – 15 | Jarc – 27 | -12 | Lun Jarc’s prolific scoring performance was the driving force behind Slovenia’s victory. |
| Key Players | Alba – 12, Ruggeri – 14 | Rupnik- 14, Rezec- 16 | | Key players for each team during the match.|
Analysis:
The key takeaway from this statistical comparison is the disparity in shooting percentages.Italy’s poor performance from both the field and the free-throw line proved costly. While they managed to secure more rebounds, their inability to convert those opportunities into points ultimately led to their defeat.
FAQ: Common Questions About the Italy vs. Slovenia game
To further enhance understanding and address common queries, here is a detailed FAQ section:
Q1: What was the final score of the Under 17 Bronze Medal game?
A1: The final score was Slovenia 79, Italy 71.
Q2: Who were the top scorers for each team?
A2: For Slovenia, Lun Jarc led the team with 27 points. For italy,Ventura scored 15 points.
Q3: What were italy’s main weaknesses in this game?
A3: Italy struggled with shooting accuracy, especially from three-point range and the free-throw line, which significantly impacted their scoring efficiency. This is what led to their loss.
Q4: What did Slovenia do well to secure the win?
A4: Slovenia displayed better shooting percentages, especially from beyond the arc, and benefited from a strong performance by Lun Jarc.
Q5: What does Italy’s qualification for the World Under 17 mean?
A5: Italy has already secured a spot in the World Under 17 tournament next year, regardless of the result of this game. This is an important step for the up-and-coming generation of Italian basketball players.
Q6: Who won the bronze medal?
A6: Slovenia won the bronze medal after defeating Italy.
