Federal Justice dismissed the cause against Adolfo Potazcek, in whose house of General Barrio Bustos A great magnitude operation was deployed, which in June 2024 left as a balance more than 50 kidnapped war weapons.
At the time, the case took great public notoriety due to the presence of the first flat of the Ministry of Security, including the holder of the portfolio, Juan Pablo Quinterosand the police deputy, Alejandro Mercadotoday in preventive detention arranged by the Prosecutor of Complex Crimes, Enrique Gavier.
With the excuse of being looking for a stolen cell, they entered the house and ran into a large number of Firearms, ammunition recharge machines, a tactical vest, flashlights, knives and even a handy of those who use police forces.
+ Look more: A 15 -year -old boy was killed by a stab in the chest in Córdoba and look for the aggressors
The authorities came to link one of the long weapons confiscated with the violent robbery in Nueva Córdoba in February 2018in which a police officer was dead.
Andrés Paladinoone of Potazcek’s lawyers dialogued with ElDoce.tv on the case. “We made contact with Potazcek, who told us that before the ANMAC (National Agency for Controlled Materials) it was legitimate user Category G-2 and gave us explanations of origin of each of the effects seized,” he explained, while revealed that his client tried to tell this during the operation but was not heard by the police.
The weapons were in a house in the General Barrio Bustos.By: Emmanuel Cuestas | The twelve
And he added: “The weapons were registeredlike the rest of the effects that require their registration in the ANMAC: the G-2 category allowed him to have up to 50 weapons, the knob was product of the collection of a lifetime, the flashlights, vest and handie were free sale and had been acquired via online ”.
For his part, Paladino, who brought Potazcek’s defense with the lawyer Oscar ZárateHe said that his client was not even subject to criminal imputation and that he has recovered all those effects of his property.
Finally, Lawyers do not rule out initiating legal actions against those who intervened in the procedure due to what they consider as a “enormous damage caused in the Potazcek person.”
