Fernando Alonso secured a hard-fought ninth-place finish at the Formula 1 Dutch Grand Prix at Circuit Zandvoort, executing a bold one-stop strategy that relied heavily on the durability of his Pirelli hard tires and a tense late-race defense against Alpine’s Pierre Gasly. While the veteran Spaniard praised the aerodynamic gains of Aston Martin’s upgraded AMR26 chassis, a sharp public divergence of opinion erupted off-track involving seasoned Spanish broadcaster Antonio Lobato and Amanda Newey, wife of the team’s chief technical officer Adrian Newey.
Alonso Praises Chassis Step Forward Despite Honda Power Deficit
Alonso’s run from 18th on the grid to score two crucial championship points in Zandvoort highlighted a weekend of contrasting fortunes for the Silverstone-based squad. According to team reports, the two-time world champion completed 28 laps on soft compound rubber before switching to hard tires for a grueling 36-lap stint, emerging as the only driver on the grid to successfully complete the 72-lap grand prix with a single pit stop.
Speaking to media after the race, Alonso pointed to a significant reduction in qualifying deficits compared to the season’s opening rounds, crediting the new chassis introduced initially at Budapest and expanded in the Netherlands. “Normally, we are a little bit better in race pace because our chassis is very good, and when people have older tires, we depend more on chassis grip and not so much on tire grip,” Alonso said. However, the driver acknowledged ongoing drivability hurdles stemming from Honda’s power unit, noting that software adjustments and factory developments required from Japan cannot be solved overnight.
Antonio Lobato Sparks Debate Over AMR26 Aerodynamic Efficiency
That optimistic technical assessment faced an immediate counter-narrative from prominent Spanish Formula 1 commentator Antonio Lobato. During a live broadcast on his specialized portal SoyMotor, Lobato argued that the AMR26 remains fundamentally uncompetitive across multiple performance metrics, disputing the scale of Aston Martin’s aerodynamic progress.
“In a straight line it is the worst car. It was the slowest in Zandvoort. In fast corners it was second from the tail, in slow corners third from the tail, and in medium corners the worst,” Lobato stated during his analysis, adding that excessive aerodynamic drag compounds the team’s straight-line speed deficit. Lobato also suggested on air that teammate Lance Stroll’s race retirement stemmed from reliability concerns—a claim subsequently countered by team data indicating Stroll’s stoppage resulted from floor and aerodynamic damage sustained after hitting debris on the circuit.
Amanda Newey Fires Back on Social Media
The commentator’s sharp appraisal quickly circulated across digital platforms, gaining widespread traction on X (formerly Twitter) after user @Nachez98 published a video clip of the analysis. The online discussion drew a direct intervention from Amanda Newey, wife of Adrian Newey, who responded to the post with a concise four-letter dismissal: “Who?”, as Mundo Deportivo documented.
The high-profile rebuff from within the Newey household instantly ignited social media activity within the Formula 1 community, amplifying debates surrounding the true competitive baseline of Aston Martin’s 2026 machine as the championship prepares for its next European round.
Next Checkpoint on the Calendar
What are your thoughts on the performance trajectory of the AMR26 and the ongoing debate surrounding its aerodynamic package? Join the conversation in the comments below.
Worth a look
