The NCAA’s Division I Cabinet has approved a sweeping overhaul of eligibility rules that will give athletes five years to play five seasons of competition, ending the era of medical waivers and redshirt flexibility that has fueled years of legal battles and transfer chaos. The change, set to take effect in the 2027-28 academic year, marks the most significant shift in college sports eligibility since the NCAA began tracking seasons in the 1970s.
The new “five-in-five” model—approved unanimously on Tuesday—replaces the longstanding four-year eligibility clock with an age-based system. Athletes will now have five years from either their full-time enrollment or the academic year following their 19th birthday, whichever comes first, to complete five seasons of competition. The move eliminates nearly all exceptions for injuries, transfers, or pandemic-related disruptions, with only military service, religious missions, and maternity leave remaining as allowances.
Why the NCAA Made This Change: The Chaos of the Transfer Portal Era
The NCAA’s decision comes as a direct response to the fallout from the transfer portal’s explosion, which has seen thousands of athletes switch schools annually in search of playing time, better coaching, or NIL opportunities. Lawsuits from players like Heisman Trophy runner-up Diego Pavia—who challenged NCAA rules counting junior college seasons against Division I eligibility—have further strained the system. “There’s no way somebody could file an eligibility case based on a medical waiver now with the new rule,” said attorney Tom Mars, who represented Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss in a landmark case. “Can’t be done. You can file it, I guess, but it will be immediately dismissed.”
According to the AP, the rule change also aligns with Senate legislation addressing broader college sports reforms. But legal challenges remain. Pavia’s lawsuit, set for trial in February 2027, could test the NCAA’s authority to enforce the new model. “Athletes very well could continue to petition courts for extended eligibility based on antitrust arguments,” said Sam Ehrlich, a Boise State legal studies professor tracking NCAA litigation.
The End of Redshirt Years: How Coaches and Players React
For athletes like Tyler Shough—who spent seven years in college football before becoming an NFL starting quarterback—the new rules would have stripped away critical development time. Shough, now with the New Orleans Saints, spent two seasons at Oregon, three at Texas Tech, and a seventh-year senior season at Louisville in 2024. “I think everybody should have a chance to at least get a medical and then a redshirt,” Shough said. “I know I benefited from that experience, the maturation process, having to compete multiple years. I feel strongly about that.”
Yet the NCAA’s move reflects a broader push to standardize rosters. Tom Loy, a national recruiting analyst for 247Sports, predicts coaches will prioritize retaining upperclassmen over chasing transfer portal talent. “With the opportunity to play five full seasons, they could have a roster full of 23-year-olds,” Loy said. “Beyond that, potentially have a group full of talent they have developed in their system.”
Detroit Lions defensive lineman Aidan Keanaaina, who played six years in college (including two postgraduate seasons at California), acknowledged the trade-offs. “You can’t please everyone in this world, ever,” he said. “But they’re trying to please as many people as they can and do right by as many people as possible.” Keanaaina’s path—extended by a medical redshirt and pandemic waivers—would be impossible under the new rules.
What Happens Next: Legal Battles, Recruiting Shifts, and the Portal’s Future
The NCAA’s rule change will not silence legal challenges entirely. Pavia’s lawsuit, which argues that counting junior college seasons unfairly limits Division I eligibility, remains a wild card. If courts side with Pavia, the NCAA could face pressure to revise the five-in-five model before it takes effect. “Whether it works out or not, everyone would get a glimpse at where each prospect stands compared to others,” said Kelsey Fee, a sports law expert. “But it will open up the portal to a new slew of craziness with kids looking to use their fifth year.”
For recruiting, the impact will be immediate. Coaches will now have a clearer five-year window to develop talent, reducing the incentive to poach players mid-career. But the portal’s chaos may simply shift to a new frontier: athletes with one year of eligibility left could become prime targets for schools seeking to extend their stay. “It will be good for sports like lacrosse where post-grad and redshirt years are less common than in football,” Fee added.
The Biggest Winners and Losers Under the New Rules
The NCAA’s shift favors stability over flexibility. Schools will gain predictability in roster management, while athletes with long careers—like Shough or Keanaaina—will see their paths narrowed. Injured players, who once relied on medical waivers, now have no recourse unless they fall into the limited exceptions. “As someone who was injured, I think it’s tough to make a one-size-fits-all rule,” Keanaaina said. “But I also get that sometimes an older player is taking opportunities away from a younger one.”
Programs in sports where redshirts are less common—like lacrosse or tennis—may see minimal disruption. But in football and basketball, where development timelines are critical, the change could reshape how coaches build depth. The five-in-five model also aligns with the NCAA’s broader push to maintain amateurism amid the NIL era, where extended eligibility could mean more years of earning potential.
What Comes Next: The 2027-28 Season and Beyond
The new rules take effect for athletes enrolling in 2027-28, meaning current players and incoming freshmen this fall can still opt into the old system. But the writing is on the wall: the NCAA’s move is a bet that structure will outlast the legal and logistical headaches of the past. “I think this new rule is one of the most sensible things the NCAA has ever done,” said NCAA President Charlie Baker. “It will absolutely eliminate the type of eligibility litigation that’s predominated lately.”
Yet the portal’s allure won’t disappear. With NIL deals now a reality, athletes may still seek transfers to maximize earning potential—just under a tighter eligibility clock. The question remains: Will the five-in-five model bring order, or will it simply redirect the chaos into new forms? One thing is certain: The era of unlimited redshirts and medical waivers is over.
For now, the NCAA has drawn a line. The next chapter—whether in courts, recruiting battles, or on the field—will determine if the gamble pays off.
Find more reporting in our Sport news section.
