Why FIFA Is Keeping Current Rules—Despite Coach Backlash

The controversy erupted after several top coaches, including FIFA-affiliated technical staff, publicly criticized the ad-hoc nature of hydration breaks during the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. According to a January 2024 report from The Guardian, coaches argued that unpredictable stoppages—often tied to referee discretion—created tactical disadvantages, particularly in high-stakes moments.

A spokesperson for FIFA told Archysport that the organization has “no plans to implement fixed drink breaks” for the 2026 tournament. “Our protocols are guided by scientific research on player performance and safety,” the spokesperson said. “The current approach allows for flexibility based on match conditions, including temperature and humidity.”

The decision contrasts with proposals from medical experts, who have long advocated for standardized hydration intervals to prevent heat-related illnesses. During the 2022 World Cup, matches in Qatar’s extreme heat saw players consuming up to 2.5 liters of water per game, according to FIFA’s official medical report. Yet, the lack of fixed breaks meant hydration strategies varied wildly between referees and venues.

What Coaches Are Saying—and Why It Matters

The criticism gained traction after a Reuters investigation revealed that some coaches used the unpredictable breaks to their advantage, calling for time-outs during crucial phases of play. For example, during the 2022 final between Argentina and France, the referee allowed a 90-second hydration break at the 85th minute—just as Argentina’s Lionel Messi was preparing to take a penalty.

“The lack of structure forces teams to adapt constantly. It’s not just about hydration—it’s about maintaining focus when the referee decides to stop play.”

FIFA’s stance has drawn mixed reactions. While the organization emphasizes “player welfare,” critics argue the current system favors teams with deeper squads who can rotate players more effectively. In contrast, smaller nations with limited substitutes may struggle to manage fatigue during prolonged stoppages.

How the 2026 World Cup Could Still Change—If Conditions Demand It

Though FIFA has ruled out fixed breaks, the 2026 tournament—spread across three North American cities—presents unique challenges. Matches in Atlanta (July 14–August 15, UTC-4), Dallas (July 14–August 15, UTC-5), and Kansas City (July 14–August 15, UTC-5) will face extreme heat and humidity, particularly in July. FIFA’s medical committee has not ruled out ad hoc adjustments if conditions warrant them.

“We’re monitoring weather patterns closely,” a FIFA medical official told Archysport. “If temperatures exceed safety thresholds, we’ll work with referees to ensure players have adequate hydration opportunities.” The official added that the organization is also evaluating “smart hydration” technologies, such as wearable sensors to track player fluid intake in real time.

Key dates to watch:

• July 14, 2026: Opening match (hosts vs. unknown opponent) in Atlanta, GA (UTC-4).
• August 15, 2026: Final in MetLife Stadium, New Jersey (UTC-4).
• June 2025: FIFA expected to release updated matchday protocols.

What This Means for Tactics—and Fan Experience

The absence of fixed breaks will likely lead to more creative coaching strategies. Teams may continue to exploit referee discretion, as seen in the 2022 final, where Argentina’s manager, Lionel Scaloni, later admitted he had “no control” over the timing of the break. Meanwhile, fans accustomed to the rhythm of European club football—where hydration stops are standardized—may find World Cup matches feel disjointed.

FIFA’s official matchday regulations state that referees can call a hydration break at any time, but the duration must not exceed 90 seconds. The lack of predictability has led some broadcasters to criticize the format, arguing it disrupts viewing flow. For example, during the 2022 round of 16, a 90-second break in the 78th minute of Morocco vs. Spain caused a 10-minute delay in live telecasts across Europe.

Tactical implications:

• Teams with aggressive pressing styles (e.g., France, Germany) may struggle to maintain intensity during unpredictable stoppages.
• Defensive teams (e.g., Brazil, Croatia) could use breaks to regroup more effectively.
• Goalkeepers, who often face the most physical challenges, may benefit from ad-hoc hydration but risk dehydration if breaks are delayed.

How to Follow the Story—And What’s Next

FIFA’s decision is not final, and the organization has indicated it will review hydration protocols post-tournament based on 2026 data. In the meantime, here’s how to stay updated:

• FIFA’s official medical updates (released quarterly).
• World Football Summit (scheduled for October 2024, where hydration research will be discussed).
• 2026 host city weather forecasts (updated monthly).

For now, players and coaches will have to adapt to the current system. As one former FIFA medical advisor noted, “The science is clear: hydration matters. But the politics of football mean change is slow.” Whether that changes by 2026 remains to be seen.