In a significant development regarding the ongoing legal proceedings surrounding the “Kitchen case,” retired police commissioner José Manuel Villarejo has signaled his willingness to provide testimony concerning his past interactions with Leire Díez. The announcement follows a shift in his legal strategy during recent court sessions at the Audiencia Nacional in Madrid.
Shift in Legal Strategy
Eight days after he began his testimony in the trial concerning the alleged surveillance of former treasurer Luis Bárcenas, Villarejo’s participation in the proceedings has undergone a notable change. During the most recent session, his defense attorney, Antonio García Cabrera, informed the court that the former commissioner would cease answering questions from the Public Prosecutor’s Office. This decision was attributed by his defense to his current state of health.
Consequently, Villarejo will limit his testimony to questions posed by his own defense team. He maintains his prior stance of declining to respond to inquiries from the attorney representing Luis Bárcenas or the popular accusations brought forward by the PSOE and Podemos parties.
Addressing Alleged Contacts
Outside the courtroom, reporters questioned Villarejo regarding his documented contacts with Leire Díez. References to these interactions appear multiple times within the investigative summary of the case. Responding to the inquiry, the former commissioner expressed an openness to addressing these specific matters under judicial questioning.

“I will gladly answer all of that when [Judge Santiago] Pedraz asks me,” Villarejo stated outside the court. He emphasized that his testimony in this specific context is intended to “preserve the independence and the right of defense” of his legal counsel.
Context of the Proceedings
The trial, which has drawn significant attention, centers on allegations involving the use of state resources for surveillance operations. The proceedings have been marked by complex procedural maneuvers, including the initial three-hour session last week where Villarejo responded to questions from prosecutor César de Rivas. Following the interruption of that questioning process, the focus remains on the court’s ability to navigate the remaining inquiries in light of the defense’s latest procedural shift.
As the trial continues, the next confirmed checkpoint for the proceedings will involve the court’s management of the defense’s refusal to engage with the prosecution, as well as the potential scheduling of further testimony sessions. Interested parties can monitor official updates from the Audiencia Nacional for the latest developments in this high-profile case.