The new Collective Agreement of 2023 has revolutionized the NBA trade rulesintroducing the famous “apron“- real salary caps that limit what teams can do on the market, especially in view of the deadline of February 5. In practice, these aprons divide the franchises into rigid categories: those at the bottom can spend more freely, those at the top have their hands tied to prevent the superteams from dominating too much. The result? Teams like the Celtics or Jazz have exceptions worth millions to take players for free, while others like the Knicks or Warriors have to be careful not to exceed them. In view of the trade deadline, here then an explanation inspired by ESPN what aprons are and, consequently, which franchises will have more flexibility in the market than others.
Above the second apron: zero aggregations
Franchises that exceed the second apron – the most stringent limit – are the most constrainedbut paradoxically they can still acquire 100% of the incoming player’s salary without aggregating other people’s contracts. The most significant example of this are i Cleveland Cavalierswho can take a player by exchanging dollar for dollar with the exiting player, but cannot “package” multiple exiting players to make ends meet.
Above the first apron, 100%
New York, Dallas, Golden State, Minnesota e Boston they are beyond the first apron but below the second: they enjoy 100% incoming salary acquisition without aggregations, with limits on trade exceptions if they risk exceeding the ceilings. A trade exception it is a credit created by a previous trade: when a team sells a player by paying more than he receives, that “hole” in the salary cap becomes an exception that allows you to acquire a new player without having to send back an equivalent salaryabsorbing it directly into the budget. Boston uses its 22.5 million created after July 1st, while the Mavericks have 11 million unusable: these contenders have muscles, but the CBA ties them tightly in multilateral trades.
At the edge of the first apron: flexibility with reserves
Toronto, Philadelphia and Lakers they operate at the edge of the first apron, capturing 100% of the incoming paycheck without major hurdles, as long as they don’t slip any further. It is a zone of relative flexibility, where planning well makes the difference in absorbing talent without touching the core of the roster. The same goes for Orlando, Houston e Clippers which are close to the limit but still “safe”: these teams only have their hands tied if a move pushes them beyond the first apron, otherwise they sail calmly.
Well under the apron: maximum freedom
The largest group is the “hot” one, of the franchises that they didn’t get past the first apronwith teams such as Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Denver, Detroit, Indiana, Memphis, Miami, Milwaukee, New Orleans, OKC, Phoenix, Portland, Sacramento, San Antonio, Utah and Washington. All these teams are far from the first apron and operate with the three classic brackets linked only to the outgoing salary, without apron to hold them back. They have the path paved for aggressive trades, using nontax, biannual or room exception if they have not already spent the summer signing exception. And there’s a wild card: minimum veterans like Chris Paul can be taken with no outgoing salary, simplifying everything.
More specifically, the three brackets based on the outgoing salary are the following: up to 8.27 million outgoing salary, you can take 200% plus 250 thousand in; between 8.27 and 33.1 million, the outgoing salary plus 8.5 million; over 33.1, 125% plus 250 thousand. Atlanta has 13.1 million exceptions, Jazz 18.4, Heat 16.8, Pistons 14.1 and Pelicans also 13-13.5: these can “absorb” a player without sending equal salariesa huge advantage for those who want to strengthen themselves without touching the starters. But woe betide hard-capping if you go over it.
In an increasingly mathematical NBA, these aprons are not just numbers: they decide who can hunt for an All-Star and who must settle for minimums or buyouts. The 20+ million exceptions of the Celtics or Jazz open up scenarios of one-sided blockbusters, while the Warriors or Knicks live on obsessive calculations so as not to self-destruct. It is the new world of trade, where the salary cap (explained HERE) is absolute king.
Related reading
