Novak Djokovic, previously held as an example and pride of Serbia, It is now crossed out of “traitor” by means and people close to President Aleksandar Vucic, After supporting student protests that demand new elections.
Since November last year, Students lead mass demonstrations against corruption and in favor of the rule of law, arising After the collapse of a marquee at a train station in Novi Sad, Last November, which left 16 dead.
The Government, and Vucic, which dominates Serbian policy since 2012, qualify protests as a “colored revolution” promoted from abroad and qualify students and their supporters as “traitors” and enemies “of the State.
Djokovic spoke for the first time about the tragedy in Novi Sad in mid -December and, in January, he dedicated one of his victories to a student who during protests was hit by a car and ended up in the hospital with injuries. Also Djokovic was seen in a basketball match in Belgrade with a sweatshirt with the motto “Students are champions.” And on March 15, when some 300,000 people took to the streets of Belgrade to protest against the Vucic regime, The tennis player shared photos of the march on Instagram and added: “Historical, magnificent!” “Serbia has enormous potential and its educated youth is its greatest strength. What we all need is understanding and respect. With you, Novak, ”he wrote on his social networks.
In addition, Djokovic He celebrated his victories in the recent Wimbledon tournament with the gesture of inflating something, Following one of the slogans of the protests (‘Pump it up’), with the meaning of maintaining pressure on the government. After that, the Media related to the government, such as ‘Inform’, went to the tennis player, winner of 24 ‘Grand Slam’, as a “shame”, “Supporter of violence” or even “false patriot.”
The 38 -year -old tennis star, who has never directly criticized Vucic or the Serbian government, He denied that his celebration in Wimbledon had a political sense and assured that it was a wink to his children Inspired by the song ‘Pump It Up’.
“The media related to the government spread a false image of Serbia and publicly attack critics,” Ivan Protic analyst and journalist told Efe.
Belgrade Open Transfer to Athens
Table of Contents
In early August, the organizers of the Belgrade Open, whose license is in the hands of the Djokovic family since 2021, They announced that this year the contest will not be held in the Serbian capital but in Athens.
“Despite the efforts made, it was not possible to guarantee the conditions of the tournament, so this year’s edition will not be carried out,” they said in a statement. In statements to the press outside the current United States Open in New York, The tennis player assured this week that there is always the will and the desire that the tournament be held in Belgrade, But that his brother Djordje, as an organizer, was forced to transfer him. “We hope that in the coming years there will be more favorable conditions,” said the former world.
After a recent anti -government protest, Vucic organized a great public act under the motto “We do not yield Serbia”, where citizens could leave them letters. The president read some letters live, among them that of a child who said “I love Serbia. I see the world champion Novak Djokovic”, As you could read by the images of televisions. The Presidentaccused by his critics of autocratic tendency and corruption, changed the message And he presented it as “I play basketball, I see the Euroleague and I love Nikola Jokic. Long live Serbia!”
Djokovic, before supporting students, was presented by the pro -government media as an example To Serbia. Tabloides such as ‘Kurir’, ‘Alo’, ‘Blic’ and ‘Telegraf’ described the Serbian tennis player as “a saint who walks”, “The golden knight of our people”, “The greatest of all time” or the “Serbian genius.”
VUCIC Frequently congratulated Novak
“Novak is the pride of our people and the best ambassador of Serbia in the world. Each of its victories is a triumph for Serbia,” said the politician before the tennis player’s support for protests. “For Vucic and his narcissistic personality it is especially offensive that in social networks it is often proposed that Djokovic runs for president,” Protic explains the current aversion of the president towards the tennis player.
“All governments in Serbia have used the successes of athletes to increase their popularity and integrate them into the ranks of their parties,” recalls the analyst. But now, When an athlete opposes and criticizes the government, even a world star like Djokovic, ends up being a “nobody”, a “traitor” or a “little prominent athlete”concludes.
Your opinions matter! Comment on the articles and subscribe for free to our newsletter and informative alerts in the App or the channel of WhatsApp. Are you looking to license content? Click here
Djokovic’s Shifting Public Image: A Comparative Analysis
The following table illustrates the dramatic shift in Novak Djokovic’s public perception in Serbia, highlighting the contrasting narratives presented before and after his expression of support for student protests.
| Feature | Before Student Support | After Student Support | Change in Perception | Key Influencers/Sources |
| ———————— | ———————————————————– | ————————————————————- | ————————————————————————- | —————————————- |
| Public Image | National Hero, “Golden knight,” “serbian Genius” | “Traitor,” “Shame,” “False Patriot” | Drastic; from celebrated icon to ostracized figure | Pro-government media, President Vucic’s circle |
| Media Portrayal | Praised, positive coverage showcasing achievements | Critical attacks; accusations of disloyalty and political motives | Shift to negative, dismissive, and often defamatory rhetoric | Pro-government tabloids, state-controlled outlets |
| Political Alignment | Presented as apolitical, national symbol, aligning with government narratives | Perceived as opposing the government; support for protests | Transition from a tool of soft power to a perceived threat | Djokovic’s social media activity, public statements |
| Presidential Views | Frequent congratulatory messages, public praise | Implicit criticism; attempts to downplay Djokovic’s influence | Shift from positive association to avoidance and distancing | President Aleksandar Vucic, government officials |
| Use of Success | Exploited to boost government’s image and popularity | Success ignored or downplayed; achievements questioned | Public use of Djokovic’s fame as a government asset now perceived as a liability | government, pro-government media |
| Actions | Supportive of national pride and country events | Expression of independent view | Shift to being perceived to create division | Pro-government tabloids, state-controlled outlets |
This stark contrast highlights how quickly the narrative around a public figure can change based on political alignment.
This FAQ section addresses common questions and provides clarity on the situation surrounding Novak Djokovic’s public image in Serbia.
Q: Why has Novak Djokovic’s image changed so drastically in Serbia?
A: The shift in Djokovic’s image is largely attributed to his expression of support for student protests against the Serbian government. Before this, he was celebrated as a national hero.Afterward, pro-government media and officials condemned him, casting him as a “traitor” for opposing authority.
Q: What were the student protests about?
A: The student-led protests were primarily against government corruption and a call for the rule of law. They began following the collapse of a train station marquee in Novi Sad, which resulted in multiple deaths.
Q: How did Djokovic show his support for the protests?
A: Djokovic showed support by, among other things, publicly supporting student rights and expressing his support via social media by sharing photos of protests on social media and celebrating victories with protest symbols.
Q: What is the connection between the Belgrade Open and this controversy?
A: the Belgrade Open, whose license has been held by the Djokovic family since 2021, was moved to Athens this year. While organizers cited logistical reasons, analysts suggest the event’s relocation might potentially be indirectly linked to the tennis star’s perceived fall from grace within the current political environment.
Q: What is the role of the media in this situation?
A: Pro-government media outlets have played a meaningful role in shaping public opinion.By criticizing Djokovic and labeling him negatively,these outlets have contributed to the negative shift in his image.
Q: What is the Serbian government’s view on Djokovic’s actions?
A: Before his support for the protests, the government used Djokovic’s success as a source of national pride. After, officials implicitly criticized him, shifting focus to other athletes.
Q: Has Djokovic directly criticized the Serbian government?
A: No, Djokovic has generally avoided directly criticizing the Serbian government publicly. However, his actions and statements in support of the protests have signaled his opposition.
Q: What happens next in Belgrade Open?
A: The official statement from the tournament states that they expect to have it in Belgrade in the coming years. If the political climate changes, it could affect the eventual fate of the Belgrade Open.
Q: How does this situation reflect on the relationship between sports and politics?
A: this case perfectly encapsulates the complex dynamics between sports and governments. Djokovic’s image shows how individual athletes are considered tools for soft power.
Related reading
