Dauphiné: Evenepoel Wins, Pogačar Loses Time | Stage Report

4. 11.6. Flat Finish Charmes> Saint-Peray 17 km evenepoel

Stages of this year’s race:

12345678

Stage Profile, 210m Elevation Gain (© Criterium-du-dauphine.fr)

The Criterium du Dauphiné served up a crucial test for General classification (GC) contenders on Stage 4: a challenging 17km individual time trial featuring a significant climb. This stage was poised to create the first major separations among the favorites. Many fans anticipated a fierce battle between tadej Pogačar (UAE Team Emirates), Jonas Vingegaard (Visma-Lease a Bike), and Remco evenepoel (Soudal Fast-Step), hoping this previewed the upcoming Tour de France showdown.

Evenepoel entered as the clear favorite for the stage win and the overall lead. The reigning world time trial champion aimed to demonstrate his form. With key rivals like Joshua Tarling and Filippo Ganna absent, the primary threats were Vingegaard, the two-time tour de France champion, and the course itself.

Early starters like Rémi Cavagna (Groupama-FDJ) and Tobias foss (INEOS grenadiers) set respectable times, engaging in a tight battle for the provisional lead. Cavagna ultimately held the “hot seat” by a mere three seconds. Though,the main contenders began their rides shortly thereafter,raising the stakes considerably.

Among those vying for a top-5 finish, Matteo Jorgenson (Visma-Lease a Bike) delivered a strong performance, seizing the lead with a time of 21:29. Young talent Paul Lapeira (Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale) also impressed. Though, the unexpected ride of Lenny Martinez (Bahrain Victorious) turned heads.

While Santiago buitrago (Bahrain Victorious) exceeded expectations, others like Carlos Rodríguez (INEOS Grenadiers) and Sepp Kuss (Visma-Lease a Bike) faced significant setbacks.As the top riders hit the course, the time gaps widened dramatically.

Remco Evenepoel lived up to the hype, dominating the competition. only Jonas Vingegaard managed to stay within striking distance, finishing twenty seconds behind. This victory secured the stage win and the yellow jersey for the Belgian. Florian Lipowitz (BORA-hansgrohe) put in a valiant effort, but ultimately fell four seconds short of the Maillot Jaune.

remco Evenepoel (© Photo Porter Sirotti)

The biggest surprise of the day was Tadej Pogačar’s performance. The dominant force in recent cycling seasons appeared below his usual level, finishing behind Jorgenson and losing a significant 49 seconds to Evenepoel.

Among the GC hopefuls, Enric Mas (Movistar Team) suffered substantial losses, trailing by over two minutes. Max Poole (Team DSM-Firmenich PostNL), seemingly fatigued after the Giro d’Italia, finished three minutes down. His team likely hoped for a top-10 GC finish to secure UCI points, but that now appears unlikely.This raises questions about optimal race scheduling and recovery strategies for young riders tackling multiple Grand Tours in a single season – a topic ripe for further analysis within the context of American cycling development programs.

This Stage 4 time trial provided a interesting glimpse into the current form of the top contenders and offered valuable insights into the dynamics of the upcoming Tour de France. The course, a test of both raw power and technical skill, exposed any weaknesses in the riders’ preparation and strategic decision-making.

Here’s a snapshot of the key results and time gaps from the top finishers:

Rank Rider Team Time Gap
1 Remco Evenepoel Soudal Speedy-Step 21:13
2 Jonas Vingegaard Visma-Lease a Bike 21:33 +0:20
3 Matteo Jorgenson Visma-Lease a Bike 21:29 +1:08
4 Florian Lipowitz BORA-hansgrohe 21:17 +0:32
5 Paul Lapeira Decathlon AG2R La Mondiale 21:33 +0:45
6 Lenny Martinez Bahrain Victorious 21:36 +0:49
7 Tadej Pogačar UAE Team Emirates 22:02 +0:49
8 Rémi Cavagna Groupama-FDJ 21:36 +0:51

Key Takeaways and Analysis:

  • Evenepoel’s Dominance: The reigning time trial world champion proved his mettle, showcasing superior power and technical prowess. This victory solidifies his position as a serious contender for the overall title and suggests he’s peaking at the right time.
  • Vingegaard’s Resilience: While not winning the stage, Vingegaard’s performance was a strong indicator of his form. Finishing only 20 seconds behind Evenepoel demonstrates his ability to compete at the highest level and hints at a possibly exciting rivalry in the upcoming Tour de france.
  • Pogačar’s performance: The Slovenian star’s performance was the biggest talking point. While still in the top ten, his time was visibly slower than expected, raising questions about his form, potential fatigue, or a strategic approach to the race.
  • emerging Contenders: The strong showings from riders like Jorgenson and Lapeira show that the general classification battle will be more captivating than we expected, since we know that these young athletes perform very consistently. They represent a new generation to the GC field of cycling, making the competitions and rivalry even more exciting.

Implications for the Tour de France:

This time trial served as a dress rehearsal for the Tour de France, offering invaluable data for teams and riders.

The next stages will provide opportunities for GC favorites to close the gap. With the climbing prowess of the top competitors, the next stages of the Criterium will determine the yellow jersey in the final days of the race.

The peloton during one of the stages (© Photo Sirotti)

FAQ: Criterium du Dauphiné stage 4 – Time Trial

Q: Who won Stage 4 of the Criterium du Dauphiné?

A: Remco Evenepoel of Soudal Quick-Step won Stage 4, the individual time trial.

Q: What was the course like for the Stage 4 time trial?

A: The course was a 17km individual time trial including a challenging climb,designed to test riders’ endurance and their power output.

Q: How did Jonas Vingegaard perform in the time trial?

A: Jonas Vingegaard finished second, 20 seconds behind Evenepoel. This was a strong performance and suggested his form is improving.

Q: What was Tadej Pogačar’s performance in the time trial?

A: Tadej Pogačar finished in seventh place, with a time of +0:49 behind Evenepoel, which was unexpected, suggesting that something might be off with the Slovenian.

Q: What are the implications of Stage 4 for the Tour de France?

A: Stage 4 exposed the form of top contenders which allow them to adjust their strategy and give an idea of how they might perform in the upcoming Tour de France.

Q: Where can I find the full results of stage 4?

A: Complete results are available on official cycling news websites, and sports news platforms.

Q: What dose GC stand for in cycling?

A: GC stands for General Classification. Its the overall ranking of riders based on their cumulative time across all stages of a multi-stage race like the Criterium du Dauphiné or the Tour de France.

Aiko Tanaka

Aiko Tanaka is a combat sports journalist and general sports reporter at Archysport. A former competitive judoka who represented Japan at the Asian Games, Aiko brings firsthand athletic experience to her coverage of judo, martial arts, and Olympic sports. Beyond combat sports, Aiko covers breaking sports news, major international events, and the stories that cut across disciplines — from doping scandals to governance issues to the business side of global sport. She is passionate about elevating the profile of underrepresented sports and athletes.

Leave a Comment