The Niigata Prefectural Board of Education has dismissed the former judo club adviser at Niigata Prefectural Niigata Technical High School following a third-party committee finding that excessive coaching drove a third-year male student to die by suicide in 2024. In an October 23 press conference, board officials issued a formal apology to the grieving family while releasing comprehensive survey data detailing widespread reports of inappropriate disciplinary practices across regional school athletics.
Board of Education Dismisses Adviser and Disciplines School Officials
During the October 23, 2024, briefing, the Niigata Prefectural Board of Education announced the disciplinary termination of the male teacher who served as the judo club adviser. The board also issued reprimands to three administrative supervisors, including the former principal, for severe oversight failures. A third-party committee report finalized in April 2026 concluded that the adviser’s extreme coaching methods directly caused the student’s death, marking the prefecture’s first official determination of “shidō-shi”—a school death attributed to coaching abuse. Investigators noted that while the judo program officially listed three assistant advisers alongside the head coach, none of them actively participated in supervising the club, exposing critical vulnerabilities in the school’s crisis management framework.
Adviser Claims No Intent to Harm While Board Acknowledges Disconnect
During subsequent administrative questioning, the dismissed teacher acknowledged giving instructions multiple times prior to the incident but disputed the characterization of his behavior as shouting or berating. According to board summaries of the interviews, the adviser maintained that he intended to sharpen the students’ focus ahead of upcoming competitions. He stated that because of his naturally booming voice, students may have perceived standard instructions as harsh rebukes, though he claimed he never recognized his actions as verbal abuse. The board responded that the teacher’s heavy-handed approach and the subjective reality experienced by the students created a fatal disconnect, leaving the instructor to grapple with profound regret and remorse over the irreplaceable loss.
Prefecture Survey Reveals Hundreds of Students Report Inappropriate Coaching
Alongside the disciplinary announcements, the board released the results of a sweeping online, anonymous survey conducted between May 20 and June 10, 2026, which captured responses from 17,251 students and 13,554 parents. Among the student respondents, 259 individuals, or 1.5 percent, reported that they had personally experienced inappropriate coaching. An additional 391 students, representing 2.3 percent, stated they had witnessed or heard of such incidents. The most frequent complaints included persistent scolding at 45.6 percent, verbal abuse at 41.7 percent, and complete ostracization or isolation at 28.6 percent. The psychological fallout proved severe: 65.6 percent of affected students reported losing the desire to attend club activities, 42.1 percent experienced emotional instability, and 30.9 percent reported strong anxiety or fear. Furthermore, the data showed that 39.8 percent of students who faced improper treatment never reported or discussed the incidents with anyone.
Board Establishes New Oversight Protocols and Direct Reporting Channels
Confronted with findings that nearly four in ten mistreated students suffered in silence, the prefectural board emphasized that even a single report of abusive instruction is entirely unacceptable. Officials acknowledged the possibility that many other students endure harmful practices without realizing they constitute abuse due to deeply ingrained athletic cultures. To dismantle the isolation typical of traditional club structures, the board announced mandatory structural reforms. Schools must now establish multi-teacher oversight teams rather than leaving programs under the solitary control of a single adviser. The prefecture is also launching direct reporting channels that bypass standard school hierarchies, enabling staff, students, and parents to flag high-risk environments directly to regional education authorities for immediate intervention.
Related reading
