Novak Djokovic absorbed multiple time violations in Beijing during the China Open, ending with a direct penalty in the final against Alex de Minaur for blowing past the pre-serve limit.
Tennis Debate Considers Separate Shot Clock for Second Serves
That penalty has reignited a broader debate across the sport over officiating standards and whether tennis needs an entirely separate shot clock specifically to police the gap between a first and second serve.
On Sky Sports Tennis, commentator Jonathan Overend and former top-five player Johanna Konta dissected why the current 25-second shot clock only governs the lag between the end of a point and the commencement of the next service motion.

Konta acknowledged that a rule targeting the inter-serve delay is conceivable, though she stressed the problem fails to touch every competitor equally. Extended pauses, in her estimation, surface with only a select group of athletes or in the wake of exceptionally taxing, physically demanding rallies, while the rest of the field gets back to business fast.
The Slow-Pacing Paradox of the Timer
Overend took aim at the shot clock era itself, casting doubt on whether the timing mechanism has delivered on its core purpose.
In his assessment, the timer may actually be dragging down the rhythm of matches by coaxing competitors into burning through every last allotted second instead of playing instantly once a point wraps up. Konta pointed to a parallel issue in enforcement:
variable referee strictness and irregular countdown displays that erode clarity for players and spectators alike.

Alexander Zverev Bounces Ball 12,000 Times at US Open
The entire conversation around pre-serve pacing drew fresh fire from Alexander Zverev’s notorious habits. The German player previously forced the issue into the spotlight at the US Open by bouncing the ball upward of twenty times before firing off a second serve.
Tracking across five matches at Flushing Meadows revealed that Zverev bounced the ball roughly 12,000 times prior to his deliveries. Confronted about the routine afterward, Zverev admitted he neither understood why he did it nor performed the behavior on purpose.
Tactical Recovery on the Court
While protracted routines can inflict a psychological toll on opponents, they also deliver tactical perks by buying extra recovery time. During the quarterfinal clash in Beijing between Djokovic and Zverev, the lengthy pauses before Zverev’s serves handed Djokovic extended intervals to catch his breath after grueling exchanges, even as the Serbian star picked up multiple time penalties of his own during the tournament.
Keep reading