Newsletter

President of Deportivo Cali denounces corruption in arbitration, points to Imer Machado, Teófilo case | Colombian Soccer | Betplay League

Dimayor’s sanction bulletin, in which Teófilo Gutiérrez appears, sanctioned with two dates for provoking fans in the Superliga final against Tolima, unleashed the wrath of a Deportivo Cali that just lost it for the weekend’s classic against America.

The Disciplinary Commission explained that “it is fully identified that Mr. Teófilo Gutiérrez displayed a conduct that falls under the provisions of provocation to the public at the end of the game”, which makes it clear that the player’s background weighed in the decision.

However, the president of Deportivo Cali, Marco Caicedo, thinks that there are features of illegality in the harsh punishment: “in this case of Teo Gutiérrez there is a persecution against the Deportivo Cali and here there are serious acts of corruption of the entities that govern Colombian soccer”.

“The subject of Arbitration in Colombia is a headache… Imer Machado generates many doubts, not only from the teams but also from the fans themselves. What happened at the Unión Magdalena Stadium was very serious, and nothing happened “, added the director, who asked for a structure that assumes the management of the referees that is different from the one that currently governs.

There is no official response to Caicedo’s claims, who in any case understands that there is nothing to do to have Teófilo in a key duel for the recovery of Cali, just in the classic against America.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending