Laid off last month, Claude Puel left his reserve to respond to recent attacks by Roland Romeyer. The former coach of the Greens wanted to defend themselves without however wanting to harm the Stphanois club.
Puel did not want to stabilize ASSE, but …
Claude Puel Saint-tienne is a bitter failure. Laid off last month, the Castres coach left the Stphanois club in last place in the French championship. A sufficient reason to put him out even if the project that sold him arrived, when he still had players like Wesley Fofana or William Saliba in his hands, was no longer the same.
Romeyer’s charge on Puel
A few weeks after his forced departure, the co-president of ASSE, Roland Romeyer, did not hesitate to smash sugar on the back of his former coach. This one has also affirmed that Puel had made of it only his head concerning the last summer transfer window. We had the means to recruit. Some players wanted to stay, others were available. It was a choice of the general manager , criticized the Forzian leader in the columns of the daily Le Progrs. He thought that with the manpower he had available, he was going to do it . Words that did not fall on deaf ears.
Puel quickly the polmic
Indeed, Puel has decided to defend himself without falling into controversy while the club is going through a very difficult period. When a coach leaves a club, it is tempting to put all the responsibility for a situation on them. Out of respect for what ASSE represents and the end-of-season objective, I have no intention of disturbing staff, players in their company , underlined the former technician of Monaco and Lille for L’Equipe.
This is why I will not argue about the inaccuracies and contradictions held in Le Progrs by the management of the club concerning me. I remain attached to ASSE, its future and all the people I appreciate within it, – employees, staff, players – and to whom I wish the best , Puel ended. The current red lantern of Ligue 1 will appreciate, especially as the former general manager has certainly things to say about his passage.
What do you think of Puel Romeyer’s response? Do not hesitate to react and discuss in the area add a comment …
.
