Pulling out confessions with torture of hitting and kicking … “Impossible investigation” that turned a bad boy into a murderer Police officers accused of torture are dismissed from disciplinary action | PRESIDENT Online

Why is false accusation not gone? Akira Kitani, a lawyer, said, “Many judges have the premise that’the accused lie, but the prosecutor and the investigator have no motive to lie.’ I can’t do it. “

* This article is written by Akira Kitani “Illegal investigation and false accusation investigator! The act is illegal.](Nihon Hyoronsha) is a partial re-edit.

写真＝iStock.com／Atstock Productions

※The photograph is an image

In-service police officer accused of torture during interrogation

In the “Futamata Incident” introduced in this article, police officers who gave a detrimental testimony (accusation of torture) to the police were arrested and detained for false testimony, and the name of the disease was “dementia dementia”. It is a terrible incident that has been eradicated from society.

The incident occurred in January 1950 (Showa 25). It was a murder-robbery case in which four parents and children were murdered in Futamata-cho, Shizuoka Prefecture, and about 1,300 yen in cash was stolen. Investigators initially arrested a poorly behaved boy, S (18 years old at the time), on suspicion of another theft and investigated the murder-robbery.

Mr. S immediately confessed to the theft itself, but completely denied the case (murder-robbery). However, police continued to investigate the matter rigorously, and four days later, Mr. S fell into a confession. Then, a number of confessions were prepared and prosecuted.

However, the only evidence linking Mr. S to the crime was a confession. The interrogation of Mr. S was conducted for a long time in the dozo (which is also a practice field for judo) where no sound leaks to the outside. Mr. S later stated in court that he had been tortured by beating, kicking, pulling and dragging his hair during the interrogation in the dozo.

Even if the accused makes such a statement, it is unlikely that the investigator will admit it. The same was true in this case. However, in this case, an incumbent police officer (Mr. Y), who was involved halfway through the investigation, filed a complaint of torture on the newspaper.

Mr. Y, an incumbent police officer, believes in Mr. S’s innocence, but he does not believe that he will take such actions.hesitationChuchoWas.However, Mr. Y was conscientious when he learned that Mr. S had been sentenced to death.ResponsibilityCrazyI couldn’t stand it, so I made a bold decision.